sustainability - SUNY College of Environmental Science and Forestry

(Ben Green) #1

Sustainability 2011 , 3 2355


This paper focusses on the growth potential of alternative electricity supply infrastructures as con-
strained by innate physical energy balance and dynamic response limits. It seeks to provide a deeper
understanding of the powerful physical limits that are facing the alternative generating technologies–
physical limits and constraints that cannot be relaxed through economic policy measures. However, the
paper’s emphasis on the technical headroom of alternative generating technologies does not seek to sup-
plant the time-honored economic cost-benefit analysis. Nor does it question the power of the incentives
provided by market pricing mechanisms for the efficient allocation of scarce energy resources. Instead,
it seeks to facilitate a technical reality check on the potential of these technologies to have an impact on
the scale required by the global energy problem. It can also furnish more accurate and timely signals of
impending critical conditions [35]. Especially in the presence of significant market imperfections and
externalities, the paper’s net energy methodology could serve as an important complement to economic
analysis for evaluating prospective energy supply architectures.


References



  1. Hall, C.A.S.; Powers, R.; Schoenberg, W. In peak oil, EROI, investments and the economy in an
    uncertain future. InRenewable Energy Systems: Environmental and Energetic Issues; Pimentel, D.,
    Ed.; Elsevier: London, UK, 2008.

  2. Hall, C.A.S.; Balogh, S.; Murphy, D.J. What is the minimum EROI that a sustainable society must
    have? Energies 2009 , 2 , 25-47.

  3. Murphy, D.J.; Hall, C.A.S. Year in review–EROI or energy return on (energy) invested. Ann. N. Y.
    Acad. Sci. 2010 , 1185 , 102-118.

  4. Kubiszewski, I.; Cleveland, C.; Endres, P. Meta-analysis of net energy return for wind power
    systems. Renewable Energy 2010 , 35 , 218-225.

  5. Bankier, C.; Gale, S. Energy payback of roof mounted photovoltaic cells.The Env. Eng.2006, 7 ,
    11-14.

  6. Fthenakis, V.; Alsema, E. Photovoltaics energy payback times, greenhouse gas emissions and exter-
    nal costs: 2004-early 2005 status. Prog. in Photov. : Res. and Appl.2006, 14 , 275-280.

  7. Fthenakis, V.; Kim, V.; Alsema, E. Emissions from photovoltaic life cycles. Environ. Sci. Technol.
    2008 , 42 , 2168-2174.

  8. Murphy, D.J.; Hall, C.A.S.; Powers, R. New perspectives on the energy return on (energy) invest-
    ment (EROI) of corn ethanol. Environ. Dev. Sustain. 2011 , 13 , 179-202.

  9. Jacobson, M.Z.; Delucchi, M.A. Providing all global energy with wind, water, and solar power,
    part I: technologies, energy resources, quantities and areas of infrastructure, and materials. Energy
    Policy2011,in press.

  10. Jacobson, M.Z.; Delucchi, M.A. Providing all global energy with wind, water, and solar power,
    part II: reliability, system and transmission costs, and policies. Energy Policy 2011 , in press.

  11. MacKay, D. Sustainable Energy—Without the Hot Air; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge,
    UK, 2008.

  12. IEA (International Energy Agency). World Energy Outlook 2010; OECD/IEA: Paris, France, 2010.


G
Free download pdf