202 The Poetry of Mary Robinson
echo of the sense,” except for Coleridge’s emphasis on the poet’s
ability to “artificially” manufacture, through versification, metrical
excitement and energy—a quality he saw Robinson’s poetry possess-
ing in abundance. The passage above emphasizes craftsmanship and
deliberateness as well as the mandatory possession of a particular
skill, “an ear,” for the achievement of poetic effects. As Coleridge
writes, sounding conspicuously (and unintentionally) in agreement
w it h Wordswor t h, meter cont rols “t he work ings of passion” in a “ba l-
ance of antagonists” that is deliberately formulated “for the foreseen
purpose of pleasure” (2: 64). As Stephen Parrish reminds us, pleasure
is central to the metrical principles of both poets; their difference is
not so much the effect of meter but whether or not it has value dis-
tinct from the language in which the poet expresses it (“Wordsworth
and Coleridge on Meter”). For Coleridge especially, this pleasure is
ineffable: notoriously difficult to analyze, to explain, or to teach. In
explaining the “effects of metre,” Coleridge adds,
As far as metre acts in and for itself, it tends to increase the vivacity
and susceptibility both of the general feelings and of the attention.
This effect it produces by the continued excitement of surprize, and by
the quick reciprocations of curiosity still gratified and still re- excited,
which are too slight indeed to be at any one moment objects of distinct
consciousness, yet become considerable in their aggregate inf luence. As
a medicated atmosphere, or as wine during animated conversation; they
act powerfully, though themselves unnoticed. (Biographia 2: 66)
The effect Coleridge describes is not unlike Wordsworth’s explana-
tion of meter’s power “to divest language in a certain degree of its
reality, and thus to throw a sort of half consciousness of unsubstantial
existence over the whole composition” (755n). Or to put it another
way, meter is a manifestation of the art of poetry, its un- reality, a
touch of verbal and formal surrealism. In his remarkable simile, he
compares meter to “yeast, worthless or disagreeable by itself, but giv-
ing vivacity and spirit to the liquor with which it is proportionally
combined” (Biographia 2: 67). While the pleasure of meter is sub-
liminal, Coleridge asserts that it is contingent upon the relationship
between style and substance: The pleasure, he says, is “conditional,
and dependent on the appropriateness of the thoughts and expres-
sions, to which the metrical form is superadded” (Biographia 2: 69).
Coleridge characteristically is interested in the subconscious work-
ings of metrical practice as it acts upon the conscious reception of the
poetic work. Coleridge finds that her ear works in tandem with her
“full and overf lowing” mind as expressed in the poetry.
9780230100251_07_ch05.indd 2029780230100251_07_ch05.indd 202 12/28/2010 11:09:02 AM12/28/2010 11:09:02 AM
10.1057/9780230118034 - The Poetry of Mary Robinson, Daniel Robinson
Cop
yright material fr
om www
.palgra
veconnect.com - licensed to Univer
sitetsbib
lioteket i
Tr
omso - P
algra
veConnect - 2011-04-13