Stuart’s Laureates II 205
Coleridge predicted as much when he reviewed The Monk in February
of 1797 for the Critical Review. While Coleridge was generally
appalled by most of the novel, he does reserve some mild praise for
Lewis’s poetry as “far above mediocrity.” Closing the review with the
poem “The Exile,” extracted from the novel, Coleridge addresses an
underlying concern similar to Wordsworth’s—that such popular stuff
may overshadow more literature of greater merit and legitimacy; the
“exquisitely tender elegy,” Coleridge asserts, “will melt and delight
the heart, when ghosts and hobgoblins shall be found only in the
lumber- garret of a circulating library” (198). In Coleridge’s review
of The Monk, we see him privileging the techniques of lyric versifi-
cation over the ephemeral pleasures of sensational fiction, or what
would have seemed to the poet the elegance of formal construction
versus the mere scribbling of a story. Poetically minded critics such as
Coleridge possessed tools for appreciating Lewis’s versification, but
lacked a coherent perspective on this popular new genre. Robinson
knew that she had to please such critics.
Robinson certainly was one to take note of another poet’s suc-
cess in a particular form. Around the time that Lewis’s The Monk
was causing such a sensation, she had also begun inventing her own
forms, such as in the three poems Coleridge praises to Southey.
Robinson’s practice of creating her own forms comes from her formal
extravagance, but it also derives from her experience as a novelist.
It is no mere coincidence that the most practiced eponymous form
of the 1790s comes from a novel. Writers such as Robinson, Lewis,
Charlotte Smith, and Ann Radcliffe frequently interpolated poems
throughout their novels. According to most reviewers, Robinson’s
interpolated poems were the highlights of reading her fiction because
they appeared more carefully constructed than the narrative context
in which they are set. Robinson also knew that interspersing poetry
throughout works of prose fiction increased the likelihood of atten-
tion in the press, because these poems were more easily excerpted
from the work and reprinted, as Coleridge’s review of The Monk and
most reviews of her novels demonstrate. If not integral to the devel-
opment of plot, they occasionally served the development of the char-
acters who supposedly penned them and provided an entertaining
respite from the frequently convoluted and seemingly chaotic nar-
ratives Robinson, for one, tended to provide. Radcliffe and Lewis
were particularly inventive and innovative in achieving such formal
spectacles. For example, Radcliffe’s 1791 novel The Romance of the
Forest and her 1794 blockbuster The Mysteries of Udolpho feature her
peculiar eighteen- line sonnets. Robinson’s lyrical ebullience naturally
9780230100251_07_ch05.indd 2059780230100251_07_ch05.indd 205 12/28/2010 11:09:02 AM12/28/2010 11:09:02 AM
10.1057/9780230118034 - The Poetry of Mary Robinson, Daniel Robinson
Cop
yright material fr
om www
.palgra
veconnect.com - licensed to Univer
sitetsbib
lioteket i
Tr
omso - P
algra
veConnect - 2011-04-13