Stuart’s Laureates II 231
into question the overdeterminacy of meter and rhyme, what Wesling
calls “the scandal of form,” about which Wordsworth and Coleridge
are both so defensive (63). In a sense, there is a metrical story being
told in “Kubla Khan” that can be read without any regard to seman-
tics. And Robinson’s poem suggests that she comprehends not only
the verbal texture of the poem but its metrical story as well. She reads
the poem completely by reading what McFarland refers to as a poem’s
“substantia,” a term that includes all of the considerations of for-
malist theory: words and their meanings but also stanza, meter, and
rhyme (273).
“Kubla Khan” opens with a five- line variation on hymnal measure.
Coleridge follows with two regular iambic tetrameter lines to signal
a gradual shift from hymnal measure in lines 1–5 to the more aca-
demic heroic quatrain, lines 8–11, which closes the first recognizable
unit of the poem. For the next nineteen lines, Coleridge faithfully
adheres to an iambic pentameter matrix; still, he continues to mingle
the measure, as the rhyme scheme signals. By line 12, the opening of
the second section, Coleridge is self- consciously working in iambic
pentameter, so he nods at his predecessor in seven lines that resemble
the Chaucerian stanza. These seven lines are followed by a quatrain
consisting of two heroic couplets (19–22). But Coleridge’s most
impressive feat of metrical gymnastics comes in lines 23–36, fourteen
lines that form a highly irregular English sonnet. Though he corrupts
the rhyme, Coleridge still manages the requisite seven rhymes. And
he signals the turn between the octave and the sestet with not only
an end- stopped line—“Ancestral Voices prophesying War”—but with
a change in meter as well: the first four lines of the sestet recall long
hymnal measure. Of course, Coleridge closes the “sonnet” with the
traditional iambic pentameter couplet, thus providing the punchline
to his metrical joke and punctuating the second stanza. The third
stanza, describing the vision and the poet’s incantation, is a return
to the folk meters that open the poem, though with even more mis-
chievous technical variations to complete the meter. So, by the end
of “Kubla Khan,” Coleridge has essentially told the story of English
poetic practice from the native ballad forms to Chaucerian foot verse
to Renaissance sonneteering to eighteenth- century couplets and end-
ing finally in a return to the ballad form in the Romantic period. As
we shall see, Coleridge’s review of English poetry is a peculiar feature
of the kind of poem that “Kubla Khan” is, particularly as it partakes
in an eighteenth- century tradition of lyrical irregularity.
Robinson was keenly aware of this metrical play and was thus able
to read “Kubla Khan” on two levels: as a poem about the imagination,
9780230100251_07_ch05.indd 2319780230100251_07_ch05.indd 231 12/28/2010 11:09:06 AM12/28/2010 11:09:06 AM
10.1057/9780230118034 - The Poetry of Mary Robinson, Daniel Robinson
Cop
yright material fr
om www
.palgra
veconnect.com - licensed to Univer
sitetsbib
lioteket i
Tr
omso - P
algra
veConnect - 2011-04-13