Stuart’s Laureates II 233
prominent couplets disguise its form, and it ends in long hymnal mea-
sure, mocking the rhyme scheme that traditionally opens an English
sonnet.
Robinson continues the extrapolation of forms in the third stanza
but complicates it with a bewildering rhyme scheme and with seam-
lessly interfused forms. The second stanza ends with the long hymnal
measure, slightly varied, that has become a refrain for the end of each
stanza. The two fourteen- line stanzas that close the poem are again
perverted English sonnets that highlight Robinson’s recognition of
the sonnet Coleridge hides at the center of “Kubla Khan.” The rhyme
scheme of the first closely resembles that of the sonnet in “Kubla
K ha n ,” t houg h R obi n son , never whol ly i m it at ive, va r ie s it ju st enoug h
to make the similarity striking (45–58). Like Coleridge, she contains
the first three rhymes within six lines, thus defying the heroic qua-
train structure usual for an English sonnet, which this most certainly
corrupts as it has seven rhymes. And, like Coleridge, Robinson post-
pones the “b” rhyme until the sixth line; but, where Coleridge com-
pletes the rhyme after three lines, Robinson prolongs completion for
four. Even though her lines are shorter by a foot, Robinson’s exten-
sion of the rhyme creates a more varied aural effect by prohibiting
more than two couplets in the octave, where Coleridge has three. In
the sestet, Coleridge falls into the recognizable quatrain- followed- by-
couplet pattern, though now his lines are also tetrameters. Robinson
inverts this pattern to allow for the long hymnal measure refrain,
which rhymes like a quatrain and here completes the sonnet. The son-
net (59 –72) t hat closes Robinson’s poem begins w it h a st ring of t hree
couplets that end in an iambic pentameter at line 64, where Robinson
substitutes a trochee for the initial foot. Immediately following the
couplets, an envelope stanza dissolves the division between the octave
and the sestet not by enjambing the eighth and ninth lines of the son-
net, as in the Miltonic sonnet, but by making the rhyme of the tenth
line (68) dependent upon the end of the seventh (65). Ending with a
pair of couplets, Robinson prolongs the ending of the poem by two
feet with the slow length of an Alexandrine, a meter that does not
appear at all in “Kubla Khan,” providing closure to both her poem
and Coleridge’s. Robinson’s poem contains at least as much metrical
variety as Coleridge’s “Kubla Khan,” though many of her metrical
choices are notably different from his. Still, she shows that she can
employ similar techniques.
Robinson easily could have imitated “Kubla K han,” but she under-
stood the substance and style of the poem well enough to answer its
imaginative challenge. In effect, Robinson’s poem suggests a metrical
9780230100251_07_ch05.indd 2339780230100251_07_ch05.indd 233 12/28/2010 11:09:06 AM12/28/2010 11:09:06 AM
10.1057/9780230118034 - The Poetry of Mary Robinson, Daniel Robinson
Cop
yright material fr
om www
.palgra
veconnect.com - licensed to Univer
sitetsbib
lioteket i
Tr
omso - P
algra
veConnect - 2011-04-13