Corporate Finance

(Brent) #1
Overview of Capital Budgeting  175

Exhibit 8.4 Survey responses to the question, ‘How frequently does your firm use the
following techniques when deciding which projects or acquisitions to pursue?’^3
(percent) always
or almost Company size
always Mean Small Large


IRR 75.61 3.09 2.87 3.41
NPV 74.93 3.08 2.83 3.42
Payback 56.74 2.53 2.72 2.25
ROI 20.29 1.34 1.41 1.25
Discounted payback 29.45 1.56 1.58 1.55


Another survey of capital budgeting practices in Asia-Pacific suggests that DCF techniques are considered
important in Australia, Malaysia, the Philippines, and Indonesia whereas Payback and IRR are considered
important in Singapore and Hong Kong.^4
Going back to the Cochin International Airport: Will the project pay? I intend to answer this question in
the next chapter.


IN CONCLUSION


In this chapter we considered several capital budgeting techniques. Each has its limitations. Which is the
right technique then? In other words, what are the characteristics of the ‘right’ technique?



  • It should distinguish between good and bad investments.

  • It should summarize what the investment will do to the profitability of the organization.

  • It should factor in time value of money.

  • It should be unambiguous.

  • It should be in line with the corporate objective—maximization of shareholders wealth.

  • It should be applicable to a wide range of business situations.

  • It should not be biased and permit realistic comparison of one investment proposal with another.

  • It should permit simple adjustments to allow for ranges of uncertainty.

  • It should take into account the life pattern of cash flows.


Clearly NPV is the only criterion that satisfies most of these. So NPV is recommended. NPV is not an
abstract concept. A company accepting a negative NPV project will really be worse off.^5 Many managers do
not buy this argument either because they don’t know or don’t care. The second reason is more likely.
Managers are appraised on the basis of current earnings and profits. Naturally, any manager would be biased
towards those projects that generate revenues during his/her tenure even if the NPV is negative. Why should


(^3) Respondents are asked to rate on a scale of 0 (never) to 4 (always). They report the overall mean as well as the percentage
of respondents that answered 3 (almost always) or 4 (always).
(^4) Kester, George, Rosita Chang, Erlinda Echanis, Shalahuddin Haikal, Mansor Isa, Michael Skully, Kai-Chong Tsui, and
Chi Jeng Wang (1999). ‘Capital Budgeting Practices in the Asia-Pacific Region: Australia, Hong Kong, Indonesia, Malaysia,
Philippines and Singapore’, Financial Practice and Education, Spring–Summer.
(^5) Well, not really. NPV has its limitations too. The chapter on real options deals with it.

Free download pdf