368 music, philosophy, and modernity
aesthetically alive, as it clearly is for Adorno too. This hope indicates
an ambivalence in Adorno’s view that I will consider at the end of the
chapter. What, though, of hope in Mahler’s world, the world of the
pending world wars and of the demolition of optimistic bourgeois world
views?
The situation of hope in the era of the decline of bourgeois heroism
is suggested when, inMinima Moralia, Adorno criticises the evocation
of sunrise in Strauss’Alpine Symphonybecause ‘no sunrise, even one
in the high mountains is pompous, triumphal, commanding, rather
they all happen weakly and hesitantly, like the hope that it might one
day be all right, and what is emotionally overpowering lies precisely in
the unprepossessing nature of the most powerful light’ ( 4 : 126 ). Any
heroic sense of hope has given way to something akin to the idea of
hope beyond hope. This is a consequence of his interpreting the worst
events as what unmasks the underlying nature of even the less traumatic
phases of modern history.^37 He suggests a further way of understand-
ing how truth does not exclusively have to do with knowledge when he
claims that ‘In the end hope, as it wrests itself from reality by negating
it, is the only form in which truth appears. Without hope the idea of
truth would hardly be able even to be thought, and it is the cardinal
untruth to present existence which has been recognised as bad as the
truth, just because it has been recognised’ ( 4 : 110 ). Mahler’s music
expresses hope by salvaging elements of culture which have become
conventional. At the same time it reveals the limits of hope in moder-
nity, even as it conveys the continuing affective power of hope for the
individual: ‘Mahler was the first musically to draw the musical conclu-
sion from a state of consciousness which has command of nothing but
the abundance – that it just about manages to gather together – of its
individual impulses and experiences and the hope that something will
emerge from them which they are not yet, without them being faked’
( 13 : 211 ). A direct connection between objective historical spirit and
music, of the kind suggested in the link between Beethoven and Hegel,
is now impossible. There is now just the residual hope that the indi-
vidual may, despite all, convert their experience into something more
universally communicable. The individual who succeeded in doing this
would then be articulating a more general truth through their very
individuality.
37 Adorno’s stance is often questionable, but the recurrence of a return to barbarism in
developed countries is a perennial phenomenon, given certain kinds of social, political,
and economic breakdown.