EXTERNAL INFLUENCES
1
I PERCEPTIONS Ot EYENTI.TARGETTT NEEDS
I
I I LOCAL SOCIOCULTURAL CONTEXT
INNOVATION ADOPTION PROCESS
I
Am3IBUTES OF A SOClEN
RELATIVE TO INNOVATlON
(1) Pe-rmptlons regarding altrlbut68
of ~nnwaUon:
(I) simpliCity
(ii) mmpatibility
(iii) advantages
(iv) Isstability
(v) visibility
(2) MoWations for adoph
(3) Dedsionmdng and rii-hking
Kinship system
Land tenure and rwurce righb
Ac-s 10 resour~~s
Aulhority-power 6trucUres
and leadership
SDdal6lai116 saatification
Community mhesivenes8
Levelling and soda1 controls
Bellef sysrems
I
IMPACTS OF AQUACULTURE DEVELOPMENT ON
SOCIAL, CULTURAL AND ECONOMIC ENVIRONMENTS
(1) Households
(a) Land tenure and use righb
(b) Oedsionmaking and perceptions of risk
(c) (d) Land. Emorgenm labor and physical of entrepreneurship Inputs
(2) Inba-mmmunity
(a) sdal status stratilicallon
(b) Authority-per structures and leadership
(c) Community mhesiveness
(d) le) Implementation Belief svstems of social control mechanisms
(3) ~eedbackto ixternal influences
la) Conoeobd and alannlns debclenoss
Fig. 2. Paradigm of potential impacts of aquaculture innovation on social environments.
or in-kind income. There are other
relatively minor objectives.
But aquaculture is a new and not
uncommonly strange technology to many
organizations involved in development,
and most members of assistance
organizations, versed mainly in
agricultural development, are ill-equipped
to assess either the merits of aquatic food
production, the difficulty of sustaining
aquaculture where there has been no
continuous tradition of it, or the potential
negative impact on environments and
societies of inappropriate aquaculture
development. On the other hand,
aquaculture is often promoted vigorously
as a panacea by specialists with vested
interests in it. Thus given the precarious
nutritional circumstances under which
vast numbers of people in developing
countries exist, coupled with the incidence
of hunger and the occurrence of outright