Essays in Anarchism and Religion

(Frankie) #1

268 Essays in Anarchism and Religion: Volume 1


Edna H. Hong (Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press,
1985), p. 30.



  1. SUD, 126.

  2. Kierkegaard, Christian Discourses, The Crisis and a Crisis in the
    Life of an Actress, ed. and trans. Howard V. Hong and Edna H. Hong
    (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1997), p. 66–67.

  3. Proudhon, System of Economical Contradictions or, The Philosophy
    of Misery, trans. Benjamin R. Tucker (New York: Arno Press, 1972),
    pp. 83–5 (hereafter PM).

  4. Cf. the comment of Joakim Garff, ‘The Eyes of Argus: The Point
    of View and Points of View on Kierkegaard’s Work as an Author’, in
    Kierkegaard: A Critical Reader, ed. Jonathan Rée and Jane Chamberlain
    (Malden MA: Blackwell, 1998), p. 77. For critique of this approach see
    Sylvia Walsh, ‘Reading Kierkegaard With Kierkegaard Against Garff’,
    Søren Kierkegaard Newsletter 38 (July 1999), p. 4–14. My tactic of
    reading with and against Kierkegaard and Proudhon is, however, not a
    hermeneutic of mistrust towards authorial/autobiographical intention
    or self-determination but is rather an experimental attempt to think
    dialectically with the theistic and anti-theistic ideas they present.

  5. Søren Kierkegaard, Journals and Papers, 7 volumes, ed. and trans. By
    Howard V. Hong and Edna H. Hong (Bloomington, Indiana: Indiana
    University Press, 1967–1978), volume 6, entry 6523. Hereafter
    referred to as JP by volume and entry number (e.g. JP 6:6523).

  6. He was dubbed such by Karl Grün. See further Paul Thomas, Karl
    Marx and the Anarchists (Abingdon & New York: Routledge, 2010),
    p. 176.

  7. Particularly as Proudhon is critical of atheism as not sufficiently
    conscious of its dialectical relationship to theism. See further below.

  8. Ludwig Feuerbach, The Essence of Christianity, trans. George
    Elliot (New York: Prometheus Books, 1989), p. xvi.

  9. Apophatic theology is a form of negative theology which ac-
    knowledges the limits of language in relation to the otherness of
    God. It appeals to the technique of Apophasis: meaning ‘to deny’, ‘to
    speak away from’; contrasted with Kataphasis: meaning ‘to affirm’,
    ‘to speak down’, or bring down to the level of language. Key to this

Free download pdf