Hays (1981) recommends reporting Wbut converting to for interpretation. Indeed, it
is hard to disagree with that recommendation, since no intuitive meaning attaches to W
itself. Wdoes have the advantage of being bounded by zero and one, whereas does not,
but it is difficult to attach much practical meaning to the statement that the variance of col-
umn totals is 80.7% of the maximum possible variance. Whatever its faults, seems
preferable.
A test on the null hypothesis that there is no agreement among judges is possible under
certain conditions. If k$7, the quantity
is approximately distributed as on N 2 1 degrees of freedom. Such a test is seldom used,
however, because Wis usually calculated in those situations in which we seek a level of
agreement substantially above the minimum level required for significance, and we rarely
have seven or more judges.
x^2
x^2 (N 2 1)=k(N 2 1)W
rs
rs
rs
Exercises 311
Key Terms
Correlational measures (Introduction)
Measures of association (Introduction)
Validity (Introduction)
Dichotomy (10.1)
Point-biserial coefficient ( ) (10.1)
f(phi) coefficient (10.1)
Biserial correlation coefficient ( ) (10.2)
Tetrachoric correlation coefficient ( )
(10.2)
Ranking (10.3)
Spearman’s correlation coefficient for
Ranked data (rs) (10.3)
Spearman’s rho (10.3)
Kendall’st(10.3)
Kendall’s coefficient of
concordance (W) (10.5)
rt
rb
rpb
Exercises
10.1 Some people think that they do their best work in the morning, whereas others claim that
they do their best work at night. We have dichotomized 20 office workers into morning or
evening people (0 5 morning, 1 5 evening) and have obtained independent estimates of
the quality of work they produced on some specified morning. The ratings were based on
a 100-point scale and appear below.
Peak time of day: 0000000000
Performance rating: 65 80 55 60 55 70 60 70 55 70
Peak time of day: 0001111111
Performance rating: 40 70 50 40 60 50 40 50 40 60
a. Plot these data and fit a regression line.
b. Calculate and test it for significance.
c. Interpret the results.
10.2 Because of a fortunate change in work schedules, we were able to reevaluate the subjects
referred to in Exercise 10.1 for performance on the same tasks in the evening. The data are
given below.
Peak time of day: 000000000 0
Performance rating: 40 60 40 50 30 40 50 50 20 30
Peak time of day: 000111111 1
Performance rating: 40 50 30 30 50 50 40 50 40 60
rpb