appropriate to adjust for random differences among groups. (An analysis of variance on the
covariate [Distract] showed no significant effects.)
Notice that Exhibit 16.5 presents partialeta-squared for the effects. These effect-size
measures can be calculated as the difference between two values, divided by ( ).
For example, the model without the dummy variables for Task has an 5 .2762. This leaves
1 2 .2762 5 72.38% of the variation unexplained. When we add in the Task variables (going
to the full model) we have 5 .8027. This is an increase of .8027 2 .2762 5 .5265, which
accounts for .5265/.7238 5 72.74% of the variation that had been left unexplained. This is
the value given in Exhibit 16.5 for Task. Similar calculations will reproduce the other values.Adjusted Means
The method of obtaining adjusted means is simply an extension of the method employed in
the Conti and Musty example. We want to know what the cell means would have been if
the treatment combinations had not differed on the covariate.
From the full model we havewhich equalsSince we want to know what the Ymeans would be if the treatments did not differ on the
covariate, we will set for all treatments.
For all observations in the appropriate row of the design matrix, with
, is
10101000 112.518
Applying the regression coefficients and taking the intercept into account, we have=9.804
2 1.404(0) 2 6.661(0) 1 1.668(0) 1 0.292512(112.518)
Y 11 = 2 14.654 2 8.561(1) 1 19.071(0) 2 2.900(1) 1 1.437(0) 1 3.006(1)
C replaced by CCell 11C=C=112.518
2 6.661TG 211 1.668TG 221 0.292512DistractYN = 2 14.654 2 8.561T 11 19.071T 22 2.900G 11 1.437G 21 3.006TG 112 1.404TG 12
YN =b 01 b 1 C 1 b 2 T 11 b 3 T 21 b 4 G 11 b 5 G 21 b 6 TG 111 b 7 TG 121 b 8 TG 211 b 9 TG 22R^2
R^2
R^212 R^2 reduced618 Chapter 16 Analyses of Variance and Covariance as General Linear Models
- Smoking Group
Dependent Variable: ERRORS
Smoking Group
NonSmokers
Delayed smokers
Active SmokersMean
15.360a
19.696a
19.721aStd. Error
1.264
1.266
1.261Lower
Bound
12.859
17.191
17.225Upper
Bound
17.862
22.202
22.21795% Confidence
IntervalaEvaluated at covariates appeared in the model: DISTRACT 5 112.52.Exhibit 16.5 (continued)