focus, concerns, threats, and responses by major security
type (Hearne 2009).
Source: Adapted from Liotta 2005; Liotta and Owen 2006; Kha-
gram et al. 2003; Abbott et al. 2006
Table 1. Comparison of Security Approaches:
Traditional and Non-Traditional
The referent object in “traditional security” is fo-
cused on the nation-state and is, therefore, more un-
derstandably responsive to immediate external threats
and challenges from other states. Although the Cold
War, Vietnam, and other major events shaped con-
Type Focus Concerns Vulnerabilities Threats/ Responses
Traditional
Security
The State Sovereignty and
Territorial Integrity
Challenges from other states
and non-state actors
Diplomatic intervention
Economic crisis response
Military intervention
Humanitarian Support
Environmental
Security
The Ecosystem Protection of
Natural Infrastucture
Resource scarcity/depletion
Resource degradation –
pollution/waste
Demographic changes
Shocks – natural, manmade
Multinational governance
Conflict prevention
Conflict resolution
Human Security The
Individual
Integrity of
Individual
[freedom from fear]
[freedom from
want]
Personal security – violence,
hazards
Political security – repressive
state
--------------------------------
Economic security – poverty
Food security – famine,
contamination
Health security – injury,
disease
Community security – cultural
integrity
Environmental security–scar-
city, abundance, waste
Preventive diplomacy
Disaster planning
Humanitarian support
Aid investment
Sustainable
Security
The
Generational
Quality of Life
Global Sustainability Unsustainable environmental,
social, economic, and institu-
tional systems
Inequitable resource distribu-
tions
Marginalization of the majority
world
Unplanned development/
urbanization
Nonadaptive and nonresilient
systems
Institution building
Security sector reform
Military professionalism
Energy sector efficiencies
Economic investment
Adaptive management of natural
resources