recommendations to the Selection Board or Se-
lecting Official.- Develop standardized templated language that
PMs and contracting support agencies could
readily access and insert in their contracts that
address sustainability efforts consistent with
both the EO 13514 and the FAR section 23. - Insert sustainability language in the cASM tool
to address contingency life support services
and thus impact LOGCAP contracts and sub-
contracts. - Leverage contractor R&D efforts to advance
alternative energy, fuel efficiency and other
sustainability initiatives by increasing the use
of VECP options in their contracts. - Refocus the Army EQT strategy to include in-
creased emphasis on energy and interservice
collaboration. - Include review of technology maturation in
the context of the Energy Efficiency KPP in the
Capability Portfolio Reviews for all acquisition
systems. - Ensure the ASA(IE&E) is included in all the CPR
decision making efforts alongside ASA(ALT).
Part V. Conclusion
The need for sustainable weapons, equipment and
life support services is unequivocal. Similarly, the de-
sire from the field is undeniable. It is incumbent upon
the staffs at every level but in particular those within
the Headquarters, Department of the Army who are
responsible for synthesizing and reviewing require-
ments to make sustainability a part of their consider-
ation. This can be done in numerous ways within the