Transforming teaching and learning in Asia and the Pacific: case studies from seven countries; 2015

(ff) #1

Martinez-Garcia, A., Morris, S., Tscholl, M., Tracy, F. and Carmichael, P. 2012. Case-based
learning, pedagogical innovation, and semantic web technologies. IEEE Transactions on
Learning Technologies, Vol. 5, No. 2, pp. 104–16.


Michalova,N., Yusfin, S., abd Polyakov, S. 2002. Using action research in current conditions
of Russian Teacher Education. Educational Action Research, Vol. 10, No. 3, pp. 423–447.


Mioduser, D., Nachmias, R., Tubin, D. and Forkosh-Baruch, A. 2003. Analysis schema for the
study of domains and levels of pedagogical innovation in schools using ICT. Education and
Information Technologies, Vol. 8, No. 1, pp. 23–36.


Moon, B., Vlasceanu, L., and Barrows, L.C. 2003. Institutional Approaches to Teacher Education
within Higher Education in Europe: Current Models and New Developments. Bucharest:
UNESCO.


Olson, J., James, E. and Lang, M. 1999. Changing the subject: the challenge of innovation
to teacher professionalism in OECD countries. Journal of Curriculum Studies, Vol. 31, No. 1,
pp. 69–82.


Peers, C.E., Diezmann, C.M., & Watters, J.J. 2003. Supports and concerns for teacher
professional growth during the implementation of a science curriculum innovation.
Research in Science Education, Vol. 33, pp. 89–.


United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. 2014. Envisioning
Education Beyond 2015: Asia-Pacific Regional Perspectives. Bangkok, UNESCO.


_____. 2015. Transversal Competencies in Education Policy and Practice (Phase I): Regional
Synthesis Report. Bangkok, UNESCO.


Wu, J., Tennyson, R. D., Hsia, T. and Liao, Y. 2008. Analysis of e-learning innovation and
core capability using a hypercube model. Computers in Human Behavior, Vol. 24, No. 5, pp.
1851 –866.

Free download pdf