original hypothesis, no evidence for differential and
specific impact of ACT on anxiety symptoms and
IPT on depressive symptoms was obtained.
This example is a good illustration of how the
single-subject design can be used to document the
efficacy of treatment (single or combined) for a
commonly occurring clinical condition. Further,
Moras et al., using a variant of the multiple baseline
design, were able to test a hypothesis regarding the
specificity of treatment effects.
BOX4-4 Clinical Applications: The Treatment of Mixed Anxiety and Depression
Moras, Telfer, and Barlow (1993, p. 414) provided the
following description of Case 2:
The patient was a man in his mid-30s who had
three children (ranging in age from 4 to 12). He
worked full-time in a semiskilled position. His
complaints were“breaking down easy and cry-
ing a lot,”a“no care attitude,”feeling ner-
vous, and feeling like running from his job.
When asked about relationships in his life, he
said that he and his wife“seemed to be going
their own separate ways.”However, he then
quickly negated the statement by saying
that they didn’t seem to be growing apart;
rather they seemed to be closer but more
independent.
The diagnosis based on two independent
structured diagnostic interviews was co-principal
Major Depression Episode (recurrent, moderate)
5 and GAD 5.
Following are the weekly scores produced by
Case 2 on the Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI) and Beck
Depression Inventory (BDI).
Weekly changes in Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI; Beck, Epstein, & Brown, 1988) and Beck Depression Inventory (BDI;
Beck, Steer, & Garbin, 1988) scores for Case 2. (Ba1 = Baseline Week 1; Ba2 = Baseline Week 2; ACT = anxiety control
treatment; Asmt = assessment week; IPT = Interpersonal Psychotherapy of Depression treatment)
SOURCE: Moras, K., Telfer, L. A., & Barlow, D. H. (1993). Efficacy and specific effects data on new treatments: A case study strategy with mixed anxiety-
depression.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 61, 412–420. Copyright © 1993 by the American Psychological Association. Reprinted with
permission.
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
Treatment Sessions
Weekly BAI & BDI Score
Ba2Ba1 1234 6 Asmt 7
ACT IPT
5 8 9 10 11 12 Asmt
BAI Score
BDI Score
Case 2
116 CHAPTER 4