Videotaped presentations, peer modeling, discussion
groups, role-playing, monitoring smoking, and
checking repeatedly on attitudes and knowledge
about smoking were all used with elementary
schoolchildren. Such an approach seems superior to
those used with adolescents that focus on long-term
negative effects from smoking. The trick seems to be
to focus on immediate negative consequences (e.g.,
from peers) rather than delayed ones (e.g., emphy-
sema). More recent programs have supplemented
these components with modules aimed at analyzing
what leads children and adolescents to start smoking
as well as training in refusal skills for dealing with
pressure to smoke (La Torre et al., 2005).
Alcohol Abuse and Dependence
It is estimated that about 70–74% of adolescents
have tried alcohol before high school graduation;
over 40% of high-school-aged adolescents drink
alcohol within a 1-month period, and 61% of
adult men and 43% of adult women in the United
States consume alcoholic beverages regularly (Pleis
et al., 2010). Highest rates of regular alcohol con-
sumption among adults are among those with a
bachelor’s degree or higher (64%), those with a
family income of $100,000.00 or more (67%), and
White males (66%). Although some studies have
suggested positive health benefits from alcohol for
light or moderate drinkers, consumption of alcohol
has also been associated with a number of negative
outcomes. Heavy alcohol use has been associated
with increased risk for liver or neurological damage,
certain forms of cancer, cardiovascular problems,
fetal alcohol syndrome, physical aggression, suicide,
motor vehicle accidents, and violence (Brannon &
Feist, 2010). This extensive list of alcohol-related
problems has made the treatment and prevention
BOX17-3 Focus on Professional Issues: Ethnicity and Cancer Outcomes
An examination of the incidence and mortality rates
ofcommonformsofcanceramongdifferentethnic
groups reveals a number ofstriking differences
(Meyerowitz, Richardson, Hudson, & Leedham, 1998).
In general, African Americans have the highest inci-
dence rates and mortality rates overall, whereas
Latinos, Chinese Americans, and Native Americans
have the lowest rates. However, incidence and mor-
tality rates also vary according to gender and to
anatomical site of the cancer. Thus, it is difficult to
reach any general conclusions that focus on broad
ethnic labels.
One particular form of cancer in women, breast
cancer, provides an interesting paradox. On the one
hand, African American women have a lower breast
cancer incidence rate than do White American women.
However, African American women have a significantly
higher breast cancer mortality rate than do White
American women. There are many potential explana-
tions, including a higher overall mortality rate for
African American women, the influence of relative
socioeconomic disadvantage for this group, barriers to
treatment, and biological susceptibility to breast cancer
at earlier ages versus later ages.
In order to address whether socioeconomic disad-
vantage and inadequate health care access might
explain this disparity in breast cancer mortality for
African American women, Newman et al. (2006) con-
ducted a meta-analysis of studies that provided breast
cancer mortality data and data on socioeconomic fac-
tors for over 14,000 African American women as well
as over 76,000 White American women. In this way,
mortality rates could be compared between the two
groups while controlling for differences in socioeco-
nomic factors. There were several major findings of
note. First, similar to previous studies, Newman et al.
found that African American women were significantly
more likely to die from breast cancer than were White
American women. Second, this overall effect remained
significant even after controlling for socioeconomic
factors. These results are intriguing in that they sug-
gest that socioeconomic disparities alone are not likely
responsible for the increased mortality risk for African
American women with breast cancer. Although more
research is clearly needed to investigate environmental
and cultural influences on mortality rates, these results
also highlight the need for more research into breast
tumor biology as a risk factor.
500 CHAPTER 17