Law of War Handbook 2005

(Jacob Rumans) #1

APPENDIX B


EXCERPT FROM MlLOSEVlC INDICTMENT FOR WAR CRIMES IN BOSNIA AND
HERZEGOVINA

IT -02-54-T 3 1 May 2002 277


CRIMINAL RESPONSIBILITY AS A SUPERIOR UNDER ARTICLE 7(3)


  1. The Accused is charged in all counts of the Indictment with responsibility as a
    superior under Article 7(3). The essential elements for superior or command responsibility
    are:
    the existence of a superior-subordinate relationship between the accused and the
    perpetrator of the offence;
    the accused knew or had reason to know that the perpetrator was about to
    commit the offence or had done so; and
    the accused failed to take th e necessary and reasonable measures to prevent the
    offence or to punish the perpetrator.2135


Superior-Subordinate Relationship


  1. The applicable test for whether the accused had superior responsibility for acts of the
    perpetrator is one of "effective controY.2136 It is irrelevant whether the accused was a military
    leader, a civilian leader, or a civilian acting as a military leader by virtue of constitutional
    structure or self-proclaimed legitimacy.2137

  2. The accused's superior authority can be either de jwe or de facto.2138 "[F]ormal
    designation as commander should not be considered a necessary prerequisite for command
    responsibility to attach, as such responsibility may be imposed by virtue of a person's de facto
    Iposition]".2139 Evidence that the accused possessed de jwe authority, however, raises a
    presumption of "effective control unless proof to the contrary is produced".2140 The existence of the
    superior-subordinate relationship, whether de facto or de jure, need not be evidenced by an official
    appointment or formal documentation.2141 The effective control test implies that more than one
    superior may be held responsible for the same crimes.2142

  3. The status of subordinates may also be de facto.2143 The relationship of subordination
    may be direct, or may be indirect, particularly "in situations where previously existing formal
    structures have broken down and where, during an interim period, the new, possibly
    improvised, control and command structures may be ambiguous and ill-defineP.2144 A tacit
    or implicit understanding between the commander and his subordinate "as to their positioning
    vis-A-vis one another is sufficient".2145

  4. A commander need not have legal authority to prevent or punlsh acts of his
    subordinates.2146 Factors relevant to a finding of effective control by a superior over de facto
    subordinates may include, but are not limited to:
    the capacity to sign orders;2147
    the substance of orders;2148
    234
    c h(l[~ft% 8
    wu/ rf,lifz(~5 ol~(t ( oti~illc~tl~~ R L ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ I ~ ~

Free download pdf