PARTIES AND MOVEMENTS
Table 5.1 German political parties: estimated positions and
salience of environmental policy dimension
Position Salience
CDU 14.5 12.4
FDP 16.8 12.7
Greens 3.2 18.1
PDS 9.1 9.4
SPD 10.9 12.7
Notes:
Position:‘1’ represents ‘supports the environment, even at the cost of
economic growth’ and ‘20’ represents ‘supports economic growth, even
at the cost of damage to the environment’.
Salience:where ‘1’ represents ‘unimportant’ and ‘20’ represents ‘very
important’.
Source:Benoit and Laver ( 2006 ).
Subsequently, however, environmental issues were sidelined by the trouble-
some domestic economy and Schroder’s controversial Agenda 2010 reforms. ̈
An expert survey of German political scientists in 2002 (see Table5.1), not
surprisingly, shows that the environment is a very important issue for the
Greens, far more so than for the other major parties, which gave it roughly
equal emphasis, with the PDS trailing behind. Where the parties did differ
wasontheir policy positions, with the left-of-centre SPD and PDS looking
distinctly greener than the right-of-centre CDU and FDP. It is not yet clear
what impact the defeat of the red–green coalition in the 2005 federal elec-
tion will have on environmental politics. The Greens have the opportunity
to exploit any neglect of environmental and left-libertarian issues by the
CDU–SPD ‘grand coalition’ government, but the emergence of a new Left
Alliance encompassing the PDS and various disaffected former SPD mem-
bers, which did well in the 2005 election, represents real competition for
theGreens in the political space to the left of the SPD. Clearly, the party
politicisation of the environment in Germany remains fragile and heavily
dependent on wider political developments.
The analysis of party politicisation in Germany has focused on the impact
of the Greens on other parties, but as will be shown in the following sections
on Britain and the USA, green parties have had little influence in those
countries.
◗ Britain
The party politicisation of the environment in Britain has been slow, uneven
and incomplete. Until the mid-1980s, there was little interest in the environ-
ment. Subsequently, the issue gradually moved up the policy agenda, with