referenCesefland, a.d. (2002) Art and Cognition: integrating the visual arts in the curriculum, new York: Teachers
College press.
eisner, e.W. (1981) ‘on the differences between scientific and artistic approaches to Qualitative
Research’, Educational Researcher 10 (4): 5–9.
elia (2006a) Fine Art Tuning Document, european league of institutes of the arts. online. http://
[http://www.elia-artschools.org/artesnet/_downloads/Tuning_Fine_art.pdf](http://www.elia-artschools.org/artesnet/_downloads/Tuning_Fine_art.pdf>) (accessed on 15 February
2010).
—— (2006b) ‘Re:search in and Through the arts’. proceedings of the elia conference, universität
der Künste Berlin: european league of institutes of the arts.
—— (2008a) Tapping into the Potential of European Higher Arts Education [inter}artes], european league
of institutes of the arts. online. http://www.elia-artschools.org/publications/new#interartes
(accessed on 25 January 2010).
—— (2008b) The Importance of Artistic Research and its Contribution to ‘New Knowledge’ in a
Creative Europe, amsterdam: european league of institutes of the arts. online. http://www.
elia-artschools.org/_downloads/publications/position/research_paper_08.pdf (accessed on 4
February 2010).
elkins, J. (2005a) ‘The new phd in studio art’, Printed Project 4. online. http://www.docstoc.com/
docs/13460127/printed-project-4---%e2%80%98The-new-phd-in-studio-art%e2%80%99---
James-elkins (accessed on 26 January 2010).
—— (2005b) ‘The Three Configurations of practice-Based phds’, Printed Project 4: 7–19.
ellis, C. and a. Bochner (2000) ‘autoethnography, personal narrative, Reflexivity. Researcher as
subject’, in: denzin, n. and Y. lincoln, (eds) Handbook of Qualitative Research, london: sage,
733–68.
emerson, R.W. (2009 [1876]) Letters and Social Aims, Charleston, sC: BiblioBazaar llC.
engeström, Y. and V. escalante (1996) ‘mundane Tool or object of affection? The Rise and Fall
of the postal Buddy’, in: nardi, B.a., (ed.) Context and Consciousness: activity theory and human-
computer Interaction, Cambridge, ma: miT press, 325–73.
engeström, Y., R. miettinen and R.-l. punamäki (1999) Perspectives on Activity Theory, Cambridge:
Cambridge university press.
eno, B. and s. grant (1982) ‘Brian eno against interpretation’, Trouser Press. online. http://music.
hyperreal.org/artists/brian_eno/interviews/troup82a.html (accessed on 14 august 2009).
evens, a. (2005) Sound Ideas: music, machines, and experience, minneapolis, mn: university of
minnesota press.
eversman, p. (1992) ‘The experience of Theatrical space’, in: schoenmakers, h., (ed.) Performance
Theory, Reception and Audience Research, amsterdam: Tijdschrift voor Theaterwetenschap &
iCRaR, 93–114.
Fanon, F. (1986) Black Skin, White Masks, london: pluto press.
Farmer, h.g. (1931) The Organ of the Ancients: from eastern sources (Hebrew, Syriac and Arabic),
london: William Reeves.
Feldhay, R. (2009) ‘galilei und die anderen. hintergründe einer Revolution der astronomie’, in:
Renn, J., m. Valleriani and J. staude, (eds) Sterne und Weltraum Dossier, 1/2009, heidelberg:
spektrum der Wissenschaft Verlag, 84–93.
Feldman, d.h., m. Csikszentmihalyi and h. gardner (1994) Changing the World: a framework for the
study of creativity, Westport, CT: praeger.
Feyerabend, p. (1993 [1975]) Against Method, london: Verso Books.
Figuier, l. (1868) La Machine Électrique, Le Paratonnerre, La Pile de Volta, L’électromagnetisme, paris:
Furne et Jouvet.
Finnegan, C.a. (2004) ‘doing Rhetorical history of the Visual: the photograph and the archive’, in:
hill, C., a. and m. helmers, (eds) Defining Visual Rhetorics, london: Routledge.
Fisher, T.R. (2000) In the Scheme of Things: alternative thinking on the practice of architecture, minneapolis,
mn: university of minnesota press.