671017.pdf

0

2000

4000

6000

8000

10000

300 kPa 900 kPa

1500 kPa^2500 kPa

Modied PZ

0 5 10 15

− 1

( 3

kPa)

1 (%)

(a)

− 4

− 3

− 2

− 1

0

1

2

3

4

1 (%)

0 5 10 15

(%)

300 kPa 900 kPa

1500 kPa 2500 kPa

Modified PZ

(b)

Figure 5: Comparison between fittings of the modified PZ-III model and experimental triaxial tests results for rockfill material I.

Duncan-Chang EB

0 5 10 15

1 (%)

3 =300kPa 3 =900kPa

3 = 1500kPa 3 = 2500kPa

0

2000

4000

6000

8000

10000

− 1

3

(kPa)

(a)

0 5 10 15

1 (%)

− 3

− 2

− 1

0

1

2

3

(%)

Duncan-Chang EB

3 =300kPa 3 =900kPa

3 = 1500kPa 3 = 2500kPa

(b)

Figure 6: Comparison between fittings of Duncan and Chang’s EB model and experimental triaxial tests results for rockfill material II.

Modified PZ

0 5 10 15

1 (%)

3 =300kPa 3 =900kPa

3 = 1500kPa 3 = 2500kPa

0

2000

4000

6000

8000

10000

− 1

3

(kPa)

(a)

0 5 10 15

1 (%)

− 3

− 2

− 1

0

1

2

3

(%)

Modified PZ

3 =300kPa^3 =900kPa

3 = 1500kPa 3 = 2500kPa

(b)

Figure 7: Comparison between fittings of the modified PZ-III model and experimental triaxial tests results for rockfill material II.