political science

(Wang) #1

Holzer, T., Schneider, G., and Widmer,T. 2000. Discriminating decentralization:
federalism and the handling of asylum applications in Switzerland, 1938 – 1996 .Journal
of ConXict Resolution, 44 ( 2 ): 250 – 76.
Im,H.B. 1987. The rise of bureaucratic authoritarianism in South Korea.World Politics,
39 ( 2 ): 231 – 57.
Jain,R.B. 1997. Surviving the odds in the case of Indian democracy. InInstitutions and
Democratic Statecraft, ed. M. Heper, A. Kazancigil, and B. A. Rockman. Boulder, Colo.:
Westview Press.
Kaufmann,K.M. 2003. Cracks in the rainbow: group commonality as a basis for Latino
and African-American political coalitions.Political Research Quarterly, 56 ( 2 ): 199 – 210.
Keller,E.J. 1988. Review ofBlack Political Mobilization: Leadership, Power, and Mass
Behavior 1 Whose Votes Count? AYrmative Action and Minority Voting Rights,by Minion
K. C. Morrison.American Political Science Review, 82 ( 4 ): 1381 – 2.
Kellogg,C.F. 1967 .NAACP.Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Kim, C. J. and Lee,T. 2001. Interracial politics: Asian Americans and other communities of
color.Political Science and Politics, 34 : 631 – 7.
Lasswell, H. D. and Kaplan,A.[ 1950 ] 1963 .Power and Society: A Framework for Inquiry.
New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.
Levite, A. and Tarrow,S. 1983. The legitimation of excluded parties in dominant party
systems: a comparison of Israel and Italy.Comparative Politics, 15 ( 3 ): 295 – 327.
Lijphart,A. 1996. The puzzle of Indian democracy: a consociational interpretation.
American Political Science Review, 90 ( 2 ): 252 – 68.
Luciak,I.A. 2001 .After the Revolution: Gender and Democracy in El Salvador, Nicaragua,
and Guatemala. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
McClure,K.M. 1990 .DiVerence, diversity, and the limits of toleration.Political Theory, 18
( 3 ): 361 – 91.
Matland, R. E. and Montgomery,K.A. 2003 .Women’s Access to Political Power in Post-
Communist Europe. New York: Oxford University Press.
Mellen,G.W.F.[ 1844 ] 1973 .An Argument on the Unconstitutionality of Slavery, Embracing
an Abstract of the Proceedings of the National and State Conventions on This Subject.New
York: AMS Press.
McMahon,K.J. 2004 .Reconsidering Roosevelt on Race: How the Presidency paved the road
to Brown. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Miller,W.L. 1996 .Arguing About Slavery: The Great Battles in the United States Congress.
New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
Mills,K. 1997. What diVerences do women journalists make? InWomen, Media, and
Politics, ed. P. Norris. New York: Oxford University Press.
Montgomery,K.A. 2003. Introduction. InWomen’s Access to Political Power in Post-
Communist Europe, ed. R. E. Matland and K. A. Montgomery. New York: Oxford
University Press.
Norris, P. (ed.) 1997 .Women, Media, and Politics. New York: Oxford University Press.
—— and Inglehart,R. 2004 .Sacred and Secular: Religion and Politics Worldwide.New
York: Cambridge University Press.
Novkov,J. 2005. Email communication with Matthew Holden, Jr., October 14 , 2005 ,
retained for evidentiary purposes inWles of Matthew Holden, Jr.
Olson,D.J. 1988. Review ofRace and Ethnicity in Chicago Politics: A Reexamination of Pluralist
Theory, by Dianne M. Pinderhughes.American Political Science Review, 82 ( 4 ): 1382 – 3.


exclusion, inclusion, and political institutions 189
Free download pdf