Choper,J. 1980 .Judicial Review and the National Political Process. Chicago: University of
Chicago Press.
Dayton, J. and Dupre,A. 2004. School funding litigation: who’s winning the war?
Vanderbilt Law Review, 57 : 2351 – 413.
DeSmith, S. and Brazier,R. 1989. Constitutional and Administrative Law, 6 th edn.
London: Penguin.
Dworkin,R. 1977 .Taking Rights Seriously. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
—— 1996 .Freedom’s Law: The Moral Reading of the Constitution. Cambridge, Mass.:
Harvard University Press.
EdwardsIII, G. C. 2004 .Why the Electoral College is Bad for America. New Haven, Conn.:
Yale University Press.
Eisgruber,C.L. 2001. Constitutional Self-Government. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard
University Press.
Ely,J.H. 1980 .Democracy and Distrust: A Theory of Judicial Review. Cambridge, Mass.:
Harvard University Press.
Farina,C.R. 1998. Undoing the New Deal through the new presidentialism.Harvard
Journal of Law & Public Policy, 22 : 227 – 38.
Feldman,S.M. 2005. The rule of law or the rule of politics? Harmonizing the internal and
external views of Supreme Court decision making.Law and Social Inquiry, 30 : 89 – 135.
Ferguson, J. R., Babcock, L., and Shane,P.M. 2005. The subconscious inXuence of policy
preferences on constitutional reasoning.
Fisher,L. 1971. The eYciency side of separated powers.Journal of American Studies, 5 :
113 – 31.
—— 1988 .Constitutional Dialogues: Interpretation as Political Process. Princeton, NJ:
Princeton University Press.
Fiss,O. 1986. Free speech and social structure.Iowa Law Review, 71 : 1405 – 25.
Flaherty,M.S. 1996. The most dangerous branch.Yale Law Journal, 105 : 1725 – 839.
Forbath,W.E. 1999. Caste, class, and equal citizenship.Michigan Law Review, 98 : 1 – 91.
—— 2001. The New Deal constitution in exile.Duke Law Journal, 51 : 165 – 222.
—— 2004. Not so simple justice: Frank Michelman on social rights, 1969 –present.Tulsa
Law Review, 39 : 597 – 638.
Friedman,B. 1998. The history of the countermajoritarian difficulty, part one: the road to
judical supremacy.New York University Law Review, 73 : 333 – 433.
—— 2000. The history of the countermajoritarian difficulty, part four: law’s politics.
University of Pennsylvaina Law Review, 148 : 971 – 1064.
—— 2001. The history of the countermajoritarian difficulty, part three: the lesson of
Lochner.New York University Law Review, 76 : 1383 – 445.
—— 2002 a. The birth of an academic obsession: the history of the countermajoritarian
diYculty, part five.Yale Law Journal, 112 : 153 – 259.
—— 2002 b. The history of the countermajortarian difficulty, part II: reconstruction’s
political court.Georgetown Law Journal, 91 : 1 – 65.
Gillman,H. 1993 .The Constitution Besieged: The Rise and Demise ofLochnerEra Police
Powers Jurisprudence. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
—— and Clayton, C. W. (eds.) 1999 .Supreme Court Decision-Making: New Institutionalist
Approaches. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Graber,M.A. 2002. Constitutional politics and constitutional theory: a misunderstood
and neglected relationship.Law & Social Inquiry, 27 : 309 – 38.
analyzing constitutions 213