political science

(Wang) #1

Blais, A. and Massicotte,L. 1997. Electoral formulas: a macroscopic perspective.Euro-
pean Journal of Political Research, 32 : 107 – 29.
Blondel, J. and MU ̈ller-Rommel, F. (eds.) 1988 .Cabinets in Western Europe. New York:
St Martin’s Press.
—— —— 1993 .Governing Together. London: Macmillan.
Bogaards,M. 2000. The uneasy relationship between empirical and normative types in
consociational theory.Journal of Theoretical Politics, 12 ( 4 ): 395 – 423.
Bogdanor, V. (ed.) 1988 .Constitutions in Democratic Politics. Aldershot: Gower.
—— (ed.) 2003 .The British Constitution in the Twentieth Century. Oxford: Oxford Univer-
sity Press.
—— and Butler, D. (eds.)Democracy and Elections. Cambridge: Cambridge University
Press.
Boix,C. 1999. Setting the rules of the game: the choice of electoral systems in advanced
democracies.American Political Science Review, 93 : 609 – 24.
Brady, D. and Volden,C. 1998 .Revolving Gridlock. Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press.
Brennan, G. and Buchanan,J. 1985 .The Reason of Rules: Constitutional Political Economy.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Buchanan,J. 1990. The domain of constitutional economics.Constitutional Political
Economy, 1 ( 1 ): 1 – 18.
—— and Tullock,G. 1962 .The Calculus of Consent: Logical Foundations of Constitutional
Democracy. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Budge, I. and Keman,H. 1990 .Parties and Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Burns,J. 1965 .Presidential Government. Boston: Houghton MiZin.
Cameron,C. 2000 .Veto Bargaining. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cheibub, J. A. and Limogi,F. 2002. Modes of government formation and the survival of
presidential regimes.Annual Review of Political Science, 5 : 151 – 79.
Colomer,J.M. 1995 .Game Theory and the Transition to Democracy: The Spanish Model.
Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
—— 2000 .Strategic Transitions. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
—— 2001 a.Political Institutions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
—— 2001 b. The strategy of institutional change.Journal of Theoretical Politics, 13 ( 3 ): 235 –
48.
—— (ed.) 2004 .Handbook of Electoral System Choice. New York: Palgrave-Macmillan.
—— 2005 a. It’s the parties that choose electoral systems (or Duverger’s laws upside down).
Political Studies, 53 ( 1 ): 1 – 21.
—— 2005 b. Policy making in divided government.Public Choice, 125 : 247 – 69.
—— 2006. On the origins of electoral systems and political parties.Electoral Studies, forth-
coming. Available at: http://www.econ.upf.edu/cat/faculty/onefaculty.php?id¼p 261.
—— and Negretto,G. 2005. Can presidentialism work like parliamentarism?Government
and Opposition, 40 ( 1 ): 60 – 89.
Congleton,R.D. 2001. On the durability of king and council.Constitutional Political
Economy, 12 ( 3 ): 193 – 215.
Conley,R. 2003 .The Presidency, Congress, and Divided Government. College Station: Texas
A&M University Press.
Cox,G. 1997 .Making Votes Count. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
—— and Kernell,S. 1991 .The Politics of Divided Government. Boulder, Colo.: Westview.
—— and McCubbins,M. 1993 .Legislative Leviathan. Berkeley: University of California
Press.


comparative constitutions 233
Free download pdf