political science

(Wang) #1

Brace, P. R. and Hall,M.G. 1997. The interplay of preferences, case facts, context, and
rules in the politics of judicial choice.Journal of Politics, 59 ( 4 ): 1206 – 31.
—— —— 2005. Is judicial federalism essential to democracy? State courts in the federal
system. Unpublished manuscript.
—— Langer, L., and Hall,M.G. 2000. Measuring the preferences of state supreme court
judges.Journal of Politics, 62 ( 2 ): 387 – 413.
BrennanCenter,PressRelease 2004. Buying Time 2004 : Total Amount Spent on
Judicial Advertising Peaks at $ 21 Million. Available at: http://www.brennancenter.org/
presscenter/releases 2004 /pressrelease 2004 _ 1118 .html [accessed December 22 , 2004 ].
Caldeira, G. A. and Gibson,J.L. 1995. The legitimacy of the Court of Justice in the
European Union: models of institutional support.American Political Science Review, 89
( 2 ): 356 – 76.
—— and Zorn,C.J.W. 1998. Of time and consensual norms in the Supreme Court.
American Journal of Political Science, 42 ( 3 ): 874 – 902.
Casey,G. 1974. The Supreme Court and myth: an empirical investigation.Law and Society
Review, 8 : 385 – 419.
Clayton, C. W. and Gillman, H. (eds.) 1999 .Supreme Court Decision-Making: New
Institutionalist Approaches. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Easton,D. 1965 .A Systems Analysis of Political Life. New York: John Wiley.
Echeverria,J.D. 2001. Changing the rules by changing the players: The environmental
issue in state judicial elections.New York University Environmental Law Journal, 9 : 217 –
303.
Epstein, L. and Knight,J. 1998 .The Choices Justices Make. Washington, DC: CQ Press.
—— —— 2000. Toward a strategic revolution in judicial politics: A look back, a look
ahead.Political Research Quarterly, 53 ( 3 ): 625 – 61.
—— —— 2004. Courts and judges. Pp. 170 – 94 inThe Blackwell Companion to Law and
Society, ed. A. Sarat. Malden, Mass.: Blackwell.
Friedman,L.M. 1998 .American Law: An Introduction, rev. edn. New York: W. W. Norton.
Gibson,J.L. 1977. Discriminant functions, role orientations, and judicial behavior:
theoretical and methodological linkages.Journal of Politics, 39 ( 4 ): 984 – 1007.
—— 1978. Judges’ role orientations, attitudes and decisions: an interactive model.
American Political Science Review, 72 ( 3 ): 911 – 24.
—— 1983. From simplicity to complexity: the development of theory in the study of
judicial behavior.Political Behavior, 5 ( 1 ): 7 – 49.
—— 2004 a.Overcoming Apartheid: Can Truth Reconcile a Divided Nation?New York:
Russell Sage Foundation.
—— 2004 b. Truth, reconciliation, and the creation of a human rights culture in South
Africa.Law and Society Review, 38 ( 1 ): 5 – 40.
—— Caldeira, G. A., and Baird,V. 1998. On the legitimacy of national high courts.
American Political Science Review, 92 ( 2 ): 343 – 58.
—— —— and Spence,L.K. 2001. Public knowledge of the United States Supreme Court,
2001. Available at: http://www.artsci.wustl.edu/legit/Courtknowledge.pdf [accessed
December 20 , 2004 ].
—— —— —— 2003. The Supreme Court and the U.S. presidential election of 2000 :
wounds, self-inXicted or otherwise?British Journal of Political Science, 33 :( 4 ): 535 – 56.


532 james l. gibson

Free download pdf