Giles, M. W. and Lancaster,T.D. 1989. Political transition, social development, and legal
mobilization in Spain.American Political Science Review, 83 ( 3 ): 817 – 33.
Griffen, K. N. and Horan,M.J. 1979. Merit retention elections: what inXuences the
voters?Judicature, 63 : 78 – 88.
Gurushina,N. 1996. Supreme Court overturns Yeltin’s Decree on Nuclear Waste Disposal.
OMRI Daily Digest, April 5.
Hall,M.G. 1995. Justices as representatives: elections and judicial politics in the American
states.American Politics Quarterly, 23 ( 4 ): 485 – 503.
—— 2001. State supreme courts in American democracy: probing the myths of judicial
reform.American Political Science Review, 95 ( 2 ): 315 – 30.
Hansford,T.G. 2004. Information provision, organizational constraints, and the decision
to submit an Amicus Curiae brief in a U.S. Supreme Court case.Political Research
Quarterly, 57 ( 2 ): 219 – 30.
Haynie,S.L. 2003 .Judging in Black & White: Decision Making in the South African Appellate
Division, 1950 – 1990. New York: Peter Lang.
Helmke,G. 2002. The logic of strategic defection: court–executive relations in Argentina
under dictatorship and democracy.American Political Science Review, 96 ( 2 ): 291 – 303.
—— and Levitsky,T. 2004. Informal institutions and comparative politics: a research
agenda.Perspectives on Politics, 2 ( 4 ): 725 – 40.
Hibbing,J.R.andTheiss-Morse,E. 1995 .Congress as Public Enemy: Public Attitudes
Toward American Political Institutions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Huber, G. A. and Gordon,S.C. 2004. Accountability and coercion: is justice blind when it
runs for oYce?American Journal of Political Science, 48 ( 2 ): 247 – 63.
Karpinski,J. 1995. Polish Supreme Court validates presidential elections.OMRI Daily
Digest, December 11.
Klein,D.E. 2002 .Making Law in the United States Courts of Appeals. New York: Cambridge
University Press.
Knight, J. and Epstein,L. 1996. The norm of stare decisis.American Journal of Political
Science, 40 : 1018 – 35.
Kraus,S.J. 1995. Attitudes and the prediction of behavior: a meta-analysis of the empirical
literature.Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21 : 58 – 75.
Kritzer,H.M. 2001. The impact ofBush v. Goreon public perceptions and knowledge of
the Supreme Court.Judicature, 85 ( 1 ): 32 – 8.
—— and Voelker,J. 1998. Familiarity breeds respect: how Wisconsin citizens view their
courts.Judicature, 82 : 58 – 64.
Langer,L. 2002 .Judicial Review in State Supreme Courts: A Comparative Study. Albany:
State University of New York Press.
Maltzman, F., Spriggs, J. F., II, and Wahlbeck,P.J. 2000 .Crafting Law on the Supreme
Court: The Collegial Game. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Markovits,I. 1995 .Imperfect Justice: An East–West German Diary. New York: Oxford
University Press.
Martin, A. D. and Quinn,K.M. 2002. Dynamic ideal point estimation via Markov Chain
Monte Carlo for the U.S. Supreme Court, 1953 – 1999 .Political Analysis, 10 ( 2 ): 134 – 53.
—— —— Ruger, T. W., and Kim,P.T. 2004. Competing approaches to predicting
Supreme Court decision making.Perspectives on Politics, 2 ( 4 ): 761 – 7.
Morin,R. 1989. Wapner v. Rehnquist: no contest; TV judge vastly outpolls justices in test of
public recognition.Washington Post, June 23 :A 21.
judicial institutions 533