political science

(Wang) #1

Parkin,C. 1996. Irish divorce change delayed.United Press International, February 8.
Richards, M. J. and Kritzer,H.M. 2002. Jurisprudential regimes in Supreme Court
decision making.American Political Science Review, 96 ( 2 ): 305 – 20.
Rowland, C. K. and Carp,R.A. 1996 .Politics and Judgment in Federal District Courts.
Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
Scheb, J. M., II, and Lyons,W. 2000. The myth of legality and public evaluation of the
Supreme Court.Social Science Quarterly, 81 ( 4 ): 928 – 40.
Schwartz,H. 2000 .The Struggle for Constitutional Justice in Post-Communist Europe.
Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Segal,J.A. 1999. Supreme Court deference to Congress: an examination of the Marxist
model. Pp. 237 – 53 inSupreme Court Decision-Making: New Institutionalist Approaches,
ed. C. W. Clayton and H. Gillman. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
—— and Cover,A.D. 1989. Ideological values and the votes of U.S. Supreme Court
justices.American Political Science Review, 83 ( 2 ): 557 – 65.
—— and Spaeth,H.J. 1993 .The Supreme Court and the Attitudinal Model. New York:
Cambridge University Press.
—— —— 1996. The inXuence of Stare Decisis on the vote of United States Supreme Court
justices.American Journal of Political Science, 40 : 971 – 1003.
—— —— 2002. The Supreme Court and the Attitudinal Model Revisited. New York:
Cambridge University Press.
Sherry,S. 2004. What’s law got to do with it?Perspectives on Politics, 2 ( 4 ): 769 – 75.
Solomon, P. H., Jr. and Foglesong,T.S. 2000 .Courts and Transition in Russia: The
Challenge of Judicial Reform. Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press.
Spriggs, J. F., II and Hansford,T.G. 2001. Explaining the overruling of U. S. Supreme
Court precedent.Journal of Politics, 63 ( 4 ): 1091 – 111.
Tate, C. N. and Vallinder,T. 1995 .The Global Expansion of Judicial Power. New York:
New York University Press.
deTocqueville,A. 1945 .Democracy in America. New York: Vintage; repr. 1990.
Tsebelis,G. 2000. Veto players and institutional analysis.Governance, 13 ( 4 ): 441 – 74.
Tyler,T.R.andMitchell,G. 1994. Legitimacy and the empowerment of discretionary
legal authority: the United States Supreme Court and abortion rights.Duke Law Journal,
43 : 703 – 815.
Yates, J. L., and Whitford,A.B. 2002. The presidency and the Supreme Court afterBush
v. Gore: implications for legitimacy and eVectiveness.Stanford Law and Policy Review, 13
( 1 ): 101 – 18.


Cases Cited


Bushvs.Gore[ 2000 ] 531 U.S. 98
Chicago Police Departmentvs.Mosley[ 1971 ] 408 U.S. 92


Graynedvs.Rockford[ 1972 ] 408 U.S. 104.
Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvaniavs.Casey[ 1992 ] 533 U.S. 833.


Republican Party of Minnesotavs.White[ 2002 ] 536 U.S. 765


534 james l. gibson

Free download pdf