The History of Mathematics: A Brief Course

(coco) #1

310 10. EUCLIDEAN GEOMETRY


drawn to the other reference line. The commentary on this problem by Pappus, who

mentioned that Apollonius had left a great deal unfinished in this area, inspired

Fermat and Descartes to take up the implied challenge and solve the problem com-

pletely. Descartes offered his success in solving the locus problem to any number

of lines as proof of the value of his geometric methods.

Questions and problems


10.1. Show how it would be possible to compute the distance from the center of

a square pyramid to the tip of its shadow without entering the pyramid, after first

driving a stake into the ground at the point where the shadow tip was located at

the moment when vertical poles cast shadows equal to their length.

10.2. Describe a mechanical device to draw the quadratrix of Hippias. You need

a smaller circle of radius 2/ð times the radius that is rotating, so that you can

use it to wind up a string attached to the moving line; or conversely, you need the

rotating radius to be ð/2 times the radius of the circle pulling the line. How could

you get such a pair of circles?

10.3. Prove that the problem of constructing a rectangle of prescribed area on part

of a given base a in such a way that the defect is a square is precisely the problem of

finding two numbers given their sum and product (the two numbers are the lengths

of the sides of the rectangle). Similarly, prove that the problem of application with

square excess is precisely the problem of finding two numbers (lengths) given their

difference and product.

10.4. Show that the problem of application with square excess has a solution for

any given area and any given base. What restrictions are needed on the area and

base in order for the problem of application with square defect to have a solution?

10.5. Use an argument similar to the argument in Chapter 8 showing that the side

and diagonal of a pentagon are incommensurable to show that the side and diagonal

of a square are incommensurable. That is, show that the Euclidean algorithm, when

applied to the diagonal and side of a square, requires only two steps to produce the

side and diagonal of a smaller square, and hence can never produce an equal pair.

To do so, refer to Fig. 24.

In this figure AB = BC, angle ABC is a right angle, AD is the bisector of angle

CAB, and DE is drawn perpendicular to AC. Prove that BD = DE, DE = EC,

and AB = AE. Then show that the Euclidean algorithm starting with the pair

{AC, AB) leads first to the pair {AB, EC) = {BC, BD), and then to the pair

{CD, BD) = {CD, DE), and these last two are the diagonal and side of a square.

10.6. It was stated above that Thales might have used the Pythagorean theorem in

order to calculate the distance from the center of the Great Pyramid to the tip of its

shadow. How could this distance be computed without the Pythagorean theorem?

10.7. State the paradoxes of Zeno in your own words and tell how you would have

advised the Pythagoreans to modify their system in order to avoid these paradoxes.

10.8. Do we share any of the Pythagorean mysticism about geometric shapes that

Proclus mentioned? Think of the way in which we refer to an honorable person

as upright, or speak of getting a square deal, while a person who cheats is said

to be crooked. Are there other geometric images in our speech that have ethical

connotations?
Free download pdf