CHILD POVERTY AND INEQUALITY: THE WAY FORWARD

(Barry) #1

indices by ten or more points. Much of the major improvements in


inequality, however, appear to have taken place during the 1990s.


While the average reduction in a country’s Gini index value was 7.3


points, on average, between 1990 and 2000, this fell to 3.3 points


between 2000 and 2008. In any case, the best performers over the


near period include Burundi, Ethiopia, Lesotho, Malawi, Mali and


Sierra Leone, all of which reduced their Gini index values by two or


more points since 2000.


Despite the positive signs of progress, the region still hosts some of


the world’s most unequal countries, including Namibia and South


Africa. For high-income countries in our sample, which cover a


broad mix of countries from North America, Eastern and Western


Europe, and the Pacific Rim, among others, a wide range of trends


are evident (Figure 16). On the one hand, Estonia, Hong Kong,


Israel, Japan, Latvia, Slovakia and Slovenia are cases of significant


increases in income inequality when looking at the 1990-2008 time


period, all of which increased their Gini indices by six or more


points. On the flip side, Denmark, Ireland, South Korea, and


Trinidad and Tobago are successful examples of reducing income


disparities over the last decades. In the more recent period,


Belgium, Croatia, Estonia, New Zealand, Spain, South Korea and


Sweden stand out as having reduced income inequality, each of


which lowered its Gini index value by two or more points since



  1. Also interesting is the fact that many of the larger high-


income countries achieved negligible change in inequality since


2000, as the Gini indices in Austria, Canada, France, Italy, Poland


and the United States increased or decreased by less than one point.

Free download pdf