CHILD POVERTY AND INEQUALITY: THE WAY FORWARD

(Barry) #1

  1. Factors explaining the changes in income inequality from


1990 to 2007


2.A. External shocks


(i) Terms of trade gains. During the 1990s, the international terms


of trade of the region (2000=100) followed the business cycle, with


declines during 1990-93, and the 1998-99 and 2000-02 crises. Since


the beginning of the new century, the rapid growth of Asian


countries exerted a favorable impact on the exports and economic


performance of Latin America. In 2006, China a l o n e accounted


for a third of world coal, iron ore and aluminum consumption, a


quarter of world copper consumption, and a large share of the


world imports of agricultural commodities. The pull effect of Asian


economies resulted in a rapid growth of Latin America’s exports.


As a result, the region’s export/GDP ratio rose from 13% to 24%


on average between the 1990s and 2007. The rapid increase in the


value of exports was due to significant improvements in both


export prices and volumes, with the highest increases recorded in


energy and agricultural products such as vegetable oils, flour and


seeds (CEPAL 2007). As a result, in 2007, the regional terms of


trade index exceeded by 33% its average level of the 1990s,


generating a positive yearly shock of 3.7% of the regional GDP


between 2003 and 2007 (Ocampo 2008). In the five main oil-metal


exporting Andean countries (Bolivia, Chile, Ecuador, Peru and


Venezuela) the terms of trade gains from 2003 to 2007 were


massive and generated a positive shock of between seven percent


and 15% of GDP (Ocampo 2009).


However, these improvements in the terms of trade hide varying


situations within the region. For instance, between the 1990s and


2007, the terms of trade index rose by 52% f o r South America


(thanks to the huge gains recorded by the Andean countries), 21%


for Mexico, and 13% for Mercosur, but fell by 13% in Central


America, a region which depends on imported energy (CEPAL


2007). Of the countries adversely affected by the recent terms of


trade changes, a subset (Paraguay, Uruguay, Panama and


Nicaragua) remained specialized in the export of traditional


agricultural commodities. A second group (Costa Rica, El Salvador,


Guatemala, and Honduras) switched to the export of textiles and

Free download pdf