CHILD POVERTY AND INEQUALITY: THE WAY FORWARD

(Barry) #1

not improve if the sample is restricted to the eight main commodity


exporters (bottom-left panel), but improves (0.39 for 1990-2007,


0.63 for 2003-07) when considering the impact of terms of trade


changes on non-tax revenue for these countries between 2003 and



  1. Overall, there is only limited evidence that gains in


international terms of trade raised tax/GDP ratios. The impact on


income inequality (which could derive from the distribution of a


greater amount of rents via the budget) does not seem strong. In


addition, the impact of such redistribution is not automatic, as it


depends on the incidence of transfers carried out with the


additional revenue. In contrast, it is likely (see Figure 4) that the


main distributive effect of terms of trade takes place via the increase


in GDP growth.


Figure 2 (A, B, C, D). Average international terms of trade and tax
revenue/GDP ratio, Latin America, 1990- 07


15

17

19

21

23

25

80

90

100

110

120

1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 2006

A. Average International Terms of Trade of L.A. (left scale,
blue line) vs. Average Regional Total Revenue/GDP ratio
(right scale, red line), 1990- 2007

r=0.97 (0.98 for 2003-7)

tot Tota l Revenu e/GDP
Free download pdf