Music and the Making of Modern Science

(Barré) #1

Notes to pages 135–146 299



  1. Ibid. , 37.

  2. Ibid. , 42.

  3. Pelseneer 1951 , 480 – 482, at 482. Recall that superparticular ratios have the form n :( n+1 ); see above, 32.

  4. Smith 1960 , 119 – 122 (IV.35 – 39).

  5. Among the very few other attempts, note Birkhoff 1933. For a brief summary, see Newman 1956 , 4:2185 –

  6. Birkhoff ’ s basic equation, M O
    C


= (where M is the aesthetic measure, O the order, and C the complexity),
is consistent with Euler ’ s approach.


  1. Smith 1960 , 27 – 28 (E33, III.1.197 – 427).

  2. Helmholtz 1954 , 229 – 233.

  3. As pointed out by Jeans (1968 , 155 – 156).

  4. Smith 1960 , 68 (II.7).

  5. Ibid. , 71 (II.12).

  6. Ibid. , 71 – 72 (II.13).

  7. Ibid. , 72 (II.14).

  8. Aristotle, Poetics 1453b10 – 12 ( Aristotle 1984 , 2326); his terms are tragik ē hedon ē and katharsis.

  9. Smith 1960 , 73 (II.15 – 16).

  10. Ibid. , 23. See also Tserlyuk-Askadskaya 2007.

  11. For instance, we learn that the standard musical pitch he knew was a full major second lower than the present
    standard (A440); Smith 1960 , 42.

  12. Ibid. , 119 – 122 (IV.35 – 39). Euler seems unaware of earlier work on logarithms in music; see Wardhaugh
    2008, 43 – 56; B ü hler 2013, 39 – 41.

  13. Recall (box 4.1) that equal temperament divides the octave into twelve equal semitones, each given by the
    irrational factor^122. For instance, J. S. Bach ’ s Well-Tempered Keyboard (1722) required a temperament capable
    of playing in all twenty-four major and minor keys, though not necessarily equally; see Duffin 2007. Euler
    discusses equal temperament in his early “ Adversaria mathematica ” (1726, fol. 45r), cited in B ü hler 2013, 225,
    and reproduced in Bredekamp and Velminski 2010, 53. Euler ’ s Tentamen mentions equal temperament briefly
    at Smith 1960 , 204 – 205 (IX.17); the rest of the book uses just intonation.

  14. Ibid. , 121 (IV.38).

  15. John Wallis devised its name in 1695; see Gowers 2008 , 192 – 193, 315 – 317.

  16. Euler 1985 , 302 – 305 (E71, I.14.187 – 216).

  17. For his argument, see Euler 1985 and Sandifer 2007a , 234 – 248; 2007c , 185 – 190.

  18. Cited in Weil 1984 , 172; Dunham 1999, 7. Calinger 1996, 130 – 133, argues that the Bernoullis were a more
    important influence on Euler ’ s turn to number theory than Goldbach.

  19. See Leibniz 1989 , 212; Tserlyuk-Askadskaya 2007.

  20. Weil 1984 , 267. For Leibniz ’ s work on music, see B ü hler 2010 ; 2013, 130 – 175; for the Euler/Leibniz con-
    nection, see also Downs 2012.

  21. The proper divisors of a number exclude that number itself.

  22. See E152, I.2.86 – 162 ( Dunham 1999 , 7 – 12); Sandifer 2007c , 49 – 62.

  23. For Euler ’ s work on harmonic progressions, see McKinzie 2007. For the general history of the harmonic
    series, see Green 1969. See also Bullynck 2010.

  24. Weil 1984 , 267.

  25. Cited in Hakfoort 1995 , 60 – 65, at 61. See also Sachs, Stiebitz, and Wilson 1988.

  26. “ The Seven Bridges of K ö nigsberg, ” in Newman 1956 , 1:573 – 580 (E53, I.7.1 – 10).

  27. Euler ’ s 1736 paper is generally regarded as the origin of graph theory, a field introduced by J. J. Sylvester
    in 1878 whose terminology was codified by George P ó lya and others about 1936; see Biggs, Lloyd, and Wilson



Free download pdf