April 2022, ScientificAmerican.com 25
THE SCIENCE
OF HEALTH
Claudia Wallis is an award-winning science journalist
whose work has appeared in the New York Times, Time, Fortune
and the New Republic. She was science editor at Time and
managing editor of Scientific American Mind.
New treatments for cancer are being developed at a breathtak
ing pace. Novel drugs, immunotherapies that enhance the body’s
ability to attack tumors, and other innovations have been ap
proved at a rate of three or four a month. “Ten years ago it was
10 a year; today the pace is one a week,” marvels oncologist Tufia
Haddad, a breast cancer specialist at the Mayo Clinic. These ther
apies are not the decisive triumphs in the “war on cancer” that
politicians have promised since the 1970s. But they are smaller
wins, including the first treatments focused on the specific biol
ogy of smallcell lung cancer, metastatic melanoma and aggres
sive “triplenegative” breast cancer.
Many of the therapeutics target a gene mutation or protein
and are paired with diagnostic tests that probe tumor cells or
blood for these “biomarkers.” The influx of so many new tools pos
es both an opportunity and a challenge. Just keeping up with
breast cancer is not easy, Haddad says: “My heart goes out to com
munity oncologists who are taking care of all cancer patients.”
Community oncologists—as opposed to subspecialists working
at top cancer centers—provide about 80 percent of cancer care in
the U.S., treating a wide variety of malignancies. “On any given day
they might see 30 different patients with 30 different diagnoses,”
says hematologist Joseph Alvarnas of the City of Hope Compre
hensive Cancer Center in Duarte, Calif. “Incorporating this tor
rential evolution of knowledge is an impossible, Sisyphean task.”
The information deluge is compounded by logistical obstacles.
Some of the biomarker tests have to be handled by specialized lab
oratories, which can make them hard to access, says oncologist
Arif Kamal of Duke University. The drugs themselves can have
stratospheric costs, and insurance companies may delay authori
zation or require that patients try a cheaper drug first. Major can
cer centers have the resources to work around such barriers and
to offer patients greater access to clinical trials, which provide the
latest treatments for free. No one doubts that community oncolo
gists want the very best for their patients, but to make the newest
therapies more available—particularly to rural populations and
underserved communities of color—physicians may need strong
partnerships with big cancer centers and smarter technology.
Two key avenues for spreading knowledge are through the
National Cancer Institute’s PDQ Web site and guidelines main
tained by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network, an alli
ance of 31 leading U.S. cancer centers. Expertise also expands
through partnerships between oncologists at smaller practices
and comprehensive cancer centers. City of Hope, for example,
together with three other centers, contracts with businesses to
provide cancer care to their employees through a service called
AccessHope. It pairs farflung doctors with cancer center oncol
ogists. “We are able to look at the most complex patients at the
time of initial therapy decisionmaking or time of relapse,” Alvar
nas explains, “and we remain a phone call away as things change
for that patient.” A 2021 study led by Alvarnas’s colleague How
ard West found that in 28 percent of lung cancer cases, Access
Hope experts recommended a different course of treatment than
what was locally provided.
Ties to top cancer centers can also make it easier for commu
nity oncologists to enroll their patients in clinical trials. Surgical
oncologist Monica Bertagnolli of Boston’s DanaFarber Cancer Insti
tute notes that half of the 117 sites in the Alliance for Clinical Trials
in Oncology, which she chairs, are community practices, including
singledoctor offices. “Doctors who do research are not only up on
what’s current; they are also trying to develop new treatments.”
The difference made by the latest therapies can vary. For peo
ple with metastatic melanoma, they have raised the fiveyear sur
vival rate from 10 to 50 percent. Even when a new drug provides
just a twomonth edge in median survival, Bertagnolli notes, “if
it’s a new treatment pathway, you may be able to combine it with
something else that makes a bigger difference.”
Many experts foresee a day when artificial intelligence will help
guide such clinical decisions. “Ultimately we may be able to apply
machine learning to the data in electronic health records, which
should include all the biomarkers, pathology and characteristics
of the patient,” says William Cance, scientific director of the Amer
ican Cancer Society. But there is a long way to go because health
record systems are optimized for billing, not for tracking outcomes.
Bertagnolli, a selfdescribed “smalltown girl from Wyoming,” says
the community doctors in her research alliance are already work
ing to improve those systems: “These people are my heroes.”
Better Local
Cancer Care
Community oncologists get help keeping
up with a torrent of new treatments
By Claudia Wallis
Illustration by Fatinha Ramos