error in estimating this fraction introduces
a bias into the estimates of fractional rate
and lag time. Choice of an incubation time
which is too short may produce an over-
estimation of the indigestible residue,
an underestimation of the potentially
digestible fraction and an overestimation of
its degradation rate. Sometimes an incuba-
tion which is too long results in a concave
semi-logarithmic curve indicating than
more than one digestible pool exists.
Observations during lag time must be
removed from the data set before semi-
logarithmic regression, to prevent an
underestimation of the degradation rate. If
the discrete lag time cannot be determined
visually, an iterative approach may have to
be used to determine which data to use for
determining the rate after an initial lag
time (Mertens, 1993).
In most cases, NLIN regression
methods are preferred because they result
in the smallest residual sum of squared
deviations from the model. Model para-
meters are adjusted to the exponential
model with (Dhanoa, 1988) or without
(Ørskov and McDonald, 1979) lag time,
through an iterative procedure until the
change in the residual sums of square
meets a convergence criterion, assuming
equal error at each observation (Mertens,
1993). Advantages of this technique are
that all parameters are estimated simul-
taneously. The Marquardt method in the
NLIN procedure of SAS (1985) is used
most often.
The different methods of calculation of
degradation rates of DM, N and cell wall
components have been compared by some
authors. The same data and model may
give different parameter estimates when fit
by lnLIN compared with NLIN regression,
but both will provide acceptable estimates
of kinetic parameters when data are
collected during well-designed experiments,
i.e. a large number of incubation times
adequately spaced out. Optimal and
minimal incubation schedules have been
proposed by Mertens (1993) (Table 11.1).
Determination of effective degradability
The nylon bag technique offers the possi-
bility of measuring the extent and rate
of degradation of feed during specific
intervals. However, digestion rate relative
to rate of passage is a critical dynamic
property affecting digestibility: most non-
cell wall components in feeds are digested
rapidly with rates that are 3–10 times faster
than rates of passage; conversely, the rate
of cell wall digestion typically is of the
same magnitude as the rate of passage
In Sacco Methods 243
Table 11.1.Recommended incubation intervals (h) to obtain a precise estimate of sample degradation
kinetics for degradation models containing three parameters (Mertens, 1993).
Rapidly degradable feeds Slowly degradable feeds
Optimum Minimum Optimum Minimum
0 a 0 a
0000
2233
4466
8899
12 12 12 12
16 18
20 20 24 24
24 30
32 32 36 36
40 48
48 48 72 72
64 64 96 96
aDetermination of the water-soluble fraction.