livestock production has been evaluated
(see reviews by Anderson et al., 1991;
Moloney et al., 1991; Mersmann, 1998).
The compounds most commonly studied
include cimaterol, clenbuterol, L-644,969,
ractopamine, salbutamol and zilpaterol
(Fig. 4.1).
Summary of effects
Phenethanolamines are often referred to as
repartitioning agents because of their
ability to redirect nutrients away from
adipose tissue and toward muscle (Ricks et
al., 1984). In general, the effects of
phenethanolamines are: (i) increased rate of
weight gain; (ii) improved feed utilization
efficiency; (iii) increased leanness; and (iv)
increased dressing percentage. Using
ractopamine in swine as an example, a
summary of the effects of phenethano-
lamines is presented in Fig. 4.2.
Phenethanolamine efficacy has been
demonstrated for lambs, broilers, turkeys,
beef cattle and swine, although not all
phenethanolamines are equally effective in
all species (see Anderson et al., 1991).
Although comparisons across studies are
difficult to make due to differences in
compounds studied, dosage, duration and
response parameters measured, a sum-
marization of the available data on all
phenethenolamines shows that cattle and
sheep give substantially larger responses to
phenethanolamines than swine, with the
smallest response in chickens. Turkeys
appear to be intermediate, although this
represents data from only ractopamine
(Wellenreiter, 1991; Mersmann, 1998; Fig.
4.3). The lower response in chickens may
be due to intensive selection for growth rate
in chickens, thus less potential for improve-
ment; or perhaps due to species differences
66 D.E. Moody et al.
Fig. 4.1.Structure of several phenethanolamines evaluated as leanness enhancers in livestock. Current
classifications of receptor subtype selectivity (1- or 2-adrenergic receptor) are indicated.
04 Farm Animal Metabolism 04 20/4/00 12:02 pm Page 66