levels ≥167 g kg^1 were required to achieve
a significant response to ractopamine
(Dunshea et al., 1993). Similarly, Mitchell
et al.(1994) reported greater improvements
in gain and carcass leanness in pigs that
consumed an 180 relative to a 120 g kg^1
crude protein diet in combination with the
phenethanolamine BRL47672, and Jones et
al.(1988) concluded that rations contain-
ing 160–200 g kg^1 crude protein or lysine
equivalent were needed in swine to
optimize the growth performance response
to ractopamine. However, in contrast to the
protein levels needed for maximum gain,
increased carcass leanness in ractopamine-
fed pigs may be achieved at lower crude
protein levels (Ji et al., 1991; Jones et al.,
1992). In broilers, a linear response to
dietary protein levels (220, 240 and 260 g
of protein kg^1 ) was observed in combina-
tion with clenbuterol treatment (Hamano et
al., 1998). These authors concluded that
increased protein consumption is impor-
tant to achieve maximal gains in body
weight gain and protein to DNA ratio in
clenbuterol-fed birds. Together, these
studies indicate that increased dietary
protein levels are essential to achieve the
maximum benefit of treatment with
phenethanolamines in swine and poultry.
Models can be used for estimating the
specific level of dietary protein required
based on anticipated rates of protein accre-
tion (National Research Council, 1998).
Data describing the effect of protein on
the response to phenethanolamines in
ruminants are limited. However, Beermann
et al.(1986) observed improved perform-
ance in cimaterol-treated sheep that were
given supplemental by-pass protein. More
work is needed in this area to confirm the
interactions between phenethanolamines
and nutrition in ruminants.
Duration of treatment
Phenethanolamines are often effective for a
limited time period due in part to the
desensitization or down-regulation of
activated -adrenergic receptors (see dis-
cussion in Mode of Action). The length of
treatment before effects on weight gain
begin to plateau varies for different com-
pounds and species (see Table 4.2), but
will probably limit the use of phene-
thanolamines to the final finishing phase in
most cases. In ractopamine-treated swine,
68 D.E. Moody et al.
175
150
125
100
75
50
25
0
Percentage response relative to cattle
Cattle Sheep Pigs Chickens Turkeys
Gain Feed efficiency Leanness
Fig. 4.3.Species differences in gain, feed efficiency and leanness with phenethanolamine administration.
Values are relative differences compared with cattle. (Adapted from Mersmann, 1998; Wellenreiter, 1991.)
04 Farm Animal Metabolism 04 20/4/00 12:02 pm Page 68