Encoding: Getting Information Into Long-Term Memory • 175
lowercase or capital letters, or the number of vowels in a word, as was done in Part 1 of
the “Remembering Lists” demonstration. Shallow processing also occurs during mainte-
nance rehearsal, in which an item is repeated to keep it in memory but without consider-
ing its meaning or its connection with anything else.
Deep processing involves close attention, focusing on an item’s meaning and relat-
ing it to something else. Considering how an item might be useful in a particular situ-
ation, as was done in Part 2 of the demonstration, or creating an image of the item
in relation to another item would create deep processing. This way of processing an
item occurs during elaborative rehearsal and, according to levels-of-processing theory,
results in better memory than shallow processing.
The previous demonstration illustrated one way of varying depth of processing.
The following Method, which corresponds to the method used in an experiment by
Fergus Craik and Endel Tulving (1975), illustrates how depth of processing can be var-
ied by asking different kinds of questions about a word.
METHOD Varying Depth of Processing
The procedure for the Craik and Tulving experiment is diagrammed in ● Figure 7.1a. A question
was presented, followed by a word, and then the participant responded. Shallow processing was
achieved by asking questions about the word’s physical characteristics; deeper processing was
achieved by asking about the word’s sound; and the deepest processing was achieved by a task
that involved the word’s meaning. The following examples are similar to those used in Craik and
Tulving’s experiment.
- Shallow processing: A question about physical features of the word
Question: Is the word printed in capital letters?
Word: bird - Deeper processing: A question about rhyming
Question: Does the word rhyme with train?
Word: pain - Deepest processing: A fill-in-the-blanks question
Question: Does the word fi t into the sentence “He saw a on the street”?
Word: car
After participants responded to questions like
the ones above, they were given a memory test to
see how well they recalled the words. The results,
shown in Figure 7.1b, indicate that deeper processing
is associated with better memory.
The idea of levels of processing motivated
a great deal of research that investigated how
the way a stimulus is encoded affects the abil-
ity to retrieve it later. However, the levels-of-
processing theory and the idea of depth of
processing became less important to memory
researchers when it became apparent that it
was diffi cult to defi ne exactly what depth of
processing is.
The Diffi culty in Defi ning Depth of Processing
The way we have described depth of process-
ing is based mainly on common sense: It seems
obvious that paying attention to how a word
is used in a sentence would be “deeper” than
(a)
Ask question.
Example:
Capital letters?
Present
word.
Example: Bird
Answer
question.
Example: No
(b)
Fill in
blanks
Rhyme?
100
50
Percent correct 0
Capital
letters?
● FIGURE 7.1 (a) Sequence of events in Craik and Tulving’s (1975)
experiment. (b) Results of this experiment. Deeper processing (fi ll-in-the-
blanks question) is associated with better memory.
Copyright 2011 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part.