Cognitive Psychology: Connecting Mind, Research and Everyday Experience, 3rd Edition

(Tina Meador) #1

364 • CHAPTER 13 Reasoning and Decision Making


CONDITIONAL REASONING:


THE WASON FOUR-CARD PROBLEM


If reasoning from conditional syllogisms depended only on applying rules of formal
logic, then it wouldn’t matter whether the syllogism was stated in terms of abstract
symbols, such as p and q, or in terms of real-world examples, such as studying or robins.
However, research shows that people are often better at judging the validity of syllo-
gisms when real-world examples are substituted for abstract symbols. As we look at this
research, we will see that some real-world examples are better than others. Our main
goal, however, is not simply to show that stating a problem in real-world terms makes
it easier, but to consider how researchers have used various ways of stating a prob-
lem to propose mechanisms that explain why the real-world problems are easier. Many
researchers have used a classic reasoning problem called the Wason four-card problem.

Four cards are shown in ● Figure 13.2. Each card has a letter on one side and a number on the
other side. Your task is to indicate which cards you would need to turn over to test the following
rule: If there is a vowel on one side, then there is an even number on the other side.

When Wason (1966) posed this task (which we will
call the abstract task), 53 percent of his participants indicated
that the E must be turned over. This is correct because turning
over the E directly tests the rule. (If there is an E, then there
must be an even number, so if there is an odd number on the
other side, this would prove the rule to be false.) However,
another card needs to be turned over to fully test the rule.
Forty-six percent of Wason’s participants indicated that in
addition to the E, the 4 would need to be turned over. The
problem with this answer is that if a vowel is on the other
side of the card, this is consistent with the rule, but if a con-
sonant is on the other side, turning over the 4 tells us nothing
about the rule, because having a consonant on one side and
a vowel on the other does not violate the rule. As shown in
● Figure 13.3a, only 4 percent of Wason’s participants came
up with the correct answer—that the second card that needs
to be turned over is the 7. Turning over the 7 is important
because revealing a vowel would disconfi rm the rule.
The key to solving the card problem is to be aware of the
falsifi cation principle: To test a rule, it is necessary to look
for situations that would falsify the rule. As you can see from
Table 13.2, the only two cards that have the potential to achieve
this are the E and the 7. Thus, these are the only two cards that
need to be turned over to test the rule.

The Role of “Regulations” in the Wason Task The Wason
task has generated a great deal of research. One reason for
the degree of interest in this problem is that it is a condi-
tional reasoning task. (Note that the problem is stated as an
“If... then .. .” statement.) But the main reason researchers are
interested in this problem is that they want to determine if there
are general reasoning mechanisms that are responsible for the
improved performance when the task is stated in real-world
terms. In one of these real-world experiments, Richard Griggs
and James Cox (1982) stated the problem as follows:

EK4 7


If vowel, then even number.

●FIGURE 13.2 The Wason four-card problem (Wason,
1966). Follow the directions in the demonstration and try this
problem. (Source: Based on P. C. Wason, “Reasoning,” in B. Foss, Ed., New
Horizons in Psychology, pp. 135–151, Harmonsworth, UK: Penguin, 1966.)

50

Percent correct

0

100

Abstract “Beer”
(b)

Abstract
(a)

●FIGURE 13.3 Performance on diff erent versions of
the four-card problem. (a) Abstract version (Wason, 1966)
shown in Figure 13.2. (b) Abstract version and beer/
drinking-age version (Griggs & Cox, 1982), shown in
Figure 13.4. (Source: Based on P. C. Wason, “Reasoning,” in B. Foss, Ed.,
New Horizons in Psychology, pp. 135–151, Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin,
1966; R. A. Griggs & J. R. Cox, “The Elusive Thematic-Materials Eff ect
in Wason’s Abstract Selection Task,” British Journal of Psychology, 73,
407–420, 1982.)

Wason Selection Task


Copyright 2011 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part.
Free download pdf