426 • ReferencesSquire, L. R., & Zola-Morgan, S. (1998).
Episodic memory, semantic memory, and
amnesia. Hippocampus, 8, 205–211.
Stanfield, R. A., & Zwaan, R. A. (2001).
The effect of implied orientation derived
from verbal content on picture recogni-
tion. Psychological Science, 12, 153–156.
Stanny, C. J., & Johnson, T. C. (2000).
Effects of stress induced by a simulated
shooting on recall by police and citizen
witnesses. American Journal of Psycho-
logy, 113, 359–386.
Stevens, K. (2002, May 7). Out of the
kitchen, and other getaways. New York
Times.
Strayer, D. L., & Johnston, W. A. (2001).
Driven to distraction: Dual-task studies
of simulated driving and conversing on
a cellular telephone. Psychological
Science, 12, 462–466.
Stroop, J. R. (1935). Studies of interference in
serial verbal reactions. Journal of Experi-
mental Psychology, 18, 643–662.
Super, H., Spekreijse, H., & Lamme, V. A. F.
(2001). A neural correlate of working
memory in the monkey primary visual
cortex. Science, 293, 120–124.
Swinney, D. A. (1979). Lexical access
during sentence comprehension: (Re)
considerations of context effects. Journal
of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior,
18 , 645–659.Talarico, J. M. (2009). Freshman flashbulbs:
Memories of unique and first-time
events in starting college. Memory, 17,
256–265.
Talarico, J. M., & Rubin, D. C. (2003).
Confidence, not consistency, character-
izes flashbulb memories. Psychological
Science, 14, 455–461.
Talarico, J. M., & Rubin, D. C. (2009).
Flashbulb memories result from ordinary
memory processes and extraordinary
event characteristics. In O. Luminet &
A. Curci (Eds.), Flashbulb memories:
New issues and new perspectives.
Philadelphia: Psychology Press.
Talmi, D., Grady, C. L., Goshen-Gottstein, Y.,
& Moscovitch, M. (2005). Neuroimaging
the serial position curve. Psychological
Science, 16, 716–723.
Tanaka, J. W., & Taylor, M. (1991). Object
categories and expertise: Is the basic
level in the eye of the beholder?
Cognitive Psychology, 23, 457–482.
Tanenhaus, M. K., Leiman, J. M., &
Seidenberg, M. S. (1979). Evidence for
multiple stages in the processing of
ambiguous words in syntactic contexts.
Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal
Behavior, 18, 427–440.Tanenhaus, M. K., Spivey-Knowlton, M. J.,
Beerhard, K. M., & Sedivy, J. C. (1995).
Integration of visual and linguistic
information in spoken language compre-
hension. Science, 268, 1632–1634.
Tang, Y., Zhang, W., Chen, K., Feng, S., Ji,
Y., Shen, J., et al. (2006). Arithmetic pro-
cessing in the brain shaped by cultures.
Proceedings of the National Academy of
Sciences, 103(28), 10775–10780.
Tarkan, L. (2003, April 29). Brain surgery,
without knife or blood, gains favor.
New York Times, p. F5.
Teghtsoonian, R., Teghtsoonian, M.,
Berglund, B., & Berglund, U. (1978).
Invariance of odor strength with sniff
vigor: An olfactory analogue to size con-
stancy. Journal of Experimental
Psychology: Human Perception and
Performance, 4, 144–152.
Ter-Pogossian, M. M., Phelps, M. E.,
Hoffman, E. J., & Mullani, N. A.
(1975). A positron-emission tomograph
for nuclear imaging (PET). Radiology,
114 , 89–98.
Terr, L. C. (1994). Unchained memories:
The stories of traumatic memories lost
and found. New York: Basic Books.
Tolman, E. C. (1938). The determinants of
behavior at a choice point. Psychological
Review, 45, 1–41.
Tolman, E. C. (1948). Cognitive maps in
rats and men. Psychological Review, 55,
189–208.
Tooley, V., Bringham, J. C., Maass, A., &
Bothwell, R. K. (1987). Facial recogni-
tion: Weapon effect and attentional
focus. Journal of Applied Social Psycho-
logy, 17, 845–859.
Treadeau, K. (1997). Mega memory. New
York: William Morrow.
Treisman, A. M. (1964). Selective attention
in man. British Medical Bulletin, 20,
12–16.
Treisman, A. M. (1986). Features and
objects in visual processing. Scientific
American, 225, 114–125.
Treisman, A. M. (1998). The perception of
features and objects. In R. D. Wright
(Ed.), Visual attention (pp. 26–54). New
York: Oxford University Press.
Treisman, A. M. (2005, February 4).
Attention and binding. Presentation to
the Cognitive Science Group, University
of Arizona.
Treisman, A. M., & Schmidt, H. (1982).
Illusory conjunctions in the perception
of objects. Cognitive Psychology, 14,
107–141.
Tulving, E. (1985). How many memory sys-
tems are there? American Psychologist,
40 , 385–398.Tulving, E., & Markowitsch, H. J. (1998).
Episodic and declarative memory: Role
of the hippocampus. Hippocampus, 8,
198–204.
Tulving, E., & Pearlstone, Z. (1966).
Availability versus accessibility of infor-
mation in memory for words. Journal of
Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 5,
381–391.
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1973).
Availability: A heuristic for judging
frequency and probability. Cognitive
Psychology, 5, 207–232.
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974).
Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics
and biases. Science, 185, 1124–1131.
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1981). The
framing of decisions and the psychology
of choice. Science, 211, 453–458.
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1983).
Extensional versus intuitive reasoning:
The conjunction fallacy in probability
judgment. Psychological Review, 90,
293–315.
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1991). Loss
aversion in riskless choice. Quarterly
Journal of Economics, 106, 1039–1061.
Tversky, A., & Shafir, E. (1992). Choice
under conflict: The dynamics of deferred
decision. Psychological Science, 3,
358–361.Ungerleider, L. G., & Mishkin, M. (1982).
Two cortical visual systems. In D. J. Ingle,
M. A. Goodale, & R. J. Mansfield (Eds.),
Analysis of visual behavior (pp. 549–580).
Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Van den Broek, P. (1994). Comprehension
and memory of narrative texts. In
M. A. Gernsbacher (Ed.), Handbook of
psycholinguistics (pp. 539–588).
San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Van Petten, C., & Luka, B. J. (2006).
Neural localization of semantic context
effects in electromagnetic and hemo-
dynamic studies. Brain and Language,
97 , 279–293.
Violanti, J. M. (1998). Cellular phones and
fatal traffic collisions. Accident Analysis
and Prevention, 28, 265–270.
Vo, M. L. H., & Henderson, J. M. (2009).
Does gravity matter? Effects of semantic
and syntactic inconsistencies on the
allocation of attention during scene
perception. Journal of Vision, 9(3),
1–15.
Vogel, E. K., McCollough, A. W., &
Machizawa, M. G. (2005). Neural
measures reveal individual differences in
controlling access to working memory.
Nature, 438, 500–503.33559_15_reference_p411-428.indd 42633559_15_reference_p411-428.indd 426 13/04/10 5:46 PM13/04/10 5:46 PM
Copyright 2011 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part.