16 BriefingThe war in Ukraine The EconomistApril 2nd 2022
them we can’t find. Some of them we have
found already, and they are dead. And
some of them were replaced...The same
people are carrying out these operations.”
Mr Zelensky, by contrast, sees strength
in the grit of the humble, unarmed Ukrai
nians who “waved their hands in the mid
dle of the streets in order to stop tanks” in
Kherson, one of the cities now occupied by
Russian forces. “They decided to stand up
and do this of their own volition. I could
not have ordered them not to do it or to
throw themselves under the tank treads,”
he says. “I will stay with these people until
the end.”
He is emphatic about what that end will
be. “We believe in victory,” he says. “It’s im
possible to believe in anything else. We
will definitely win because this is our
home, our land, our independence. It’s just
a question of time.” However, getting there
depends not just on the fighting spirit of
Ukrainians, but also on support from the
West. If Ukraine is to defend its way of life,
he says, it needs tanks, armoured person
nel vehicles and military aircraft—and it
needs them now.
“[The West] can’t say, ‘We’ll help you in
the weeks [to come],’” Mr Zelensky argues.
“It doesn’t allow us to unblock Russiaoc
cupied cities, to bring food to residents
there, to take the military initiative into
our own hands.” And however strong the
spirit of Ukraine’s people, Russia has far
more firepower. “The Russians have thou
sands of military vehicles, and they are
coming and coming and coming. If we canjoke in this situation, I will. There are some
cities where there are so many tanks, they
can’t go away. They have tank traffic jams,”
he says.
Mr Zelensky divides nato into five
camps. First are those who “don’t mind a
long war because it would mean exhaust
ing Russia, even if this means the demise
of Ukraine and comes at the cost of Ukrai
nian lives”. Others want a quick end to the
fighting because “Russia’s market is a big
one [and] their economies are suffering”. A
third, more diverse group of countries “re
cognise Nazism in Russia” and want Uk
raine to prevail. They are joined by smaller
liberal countries that “want the war to end
quickly at any cost, because they think
people come first”. And last are the embar
rassed countries that want peace right
away and in any way possible, because they
are “the offices of the Russian Federation
in Europe”.
Mr Zelensky praises America and Brit
ain. Although he notes that the complex
ities of American politics have sometimes
caused delays, he acknowledges that Mr Bi
den has become increasingly engaged. But
Germany, he says, is trying to strike a bal
ance between Russia and Ukraine. “They
have a long relationship with Russia and
they are looking at the situation through
the prism of the economy,” he says. “They
can help, if there is pressure on them do
mestically to do so, and they can stop when
they see what they have done is sufficient.”
Asked why leaders like President Emman
uel Macron of France say Ukraine’s partners could not supply tanks to help Uk
raine win, he retorts, “They are afraid of
Russia. And that’s it.”
Mr Zelensky is equally frustrated by the
reactive nature of sanctions that are de
signed to punish Russia for what it has
done rather than prevent it from going fur
ther. Existing sanctions have loopholes.
Russia’s largest bank, Sberbank, for exam
ple, has not been cut off from theswift
payment system, because it is one of the
main ways Europe pays for its gas. America
has imposed an embargo on Russian oil
and gas but Europe, a far bigger customer,
has not. “The first thing is to put your
selves in our place and act preemptive
ly...We are hearing that the decision de
pends on whether Russia launches a chem
ical attack on us. This is not the right ap
proach. We are not guinea pigs.”
What does Mr Zelensky believe victory
will look like? He pauses, before delivering
the sort of answer that would be simply
unimaginable coming from Mr Putin: “Vic
tory is being able to save as many lives as
possible...because without this nothing
would make sense. Our land is important,
yes, but ultimately, it’s just territory.” To
save everyone, defend all interests while
protecting people and not giving up terri
tory is probably an impossible task, he
concedes. He does not know when or how
it will end, but he knows that “it will end
with us still standing here defending” life
in Ukraine.
Nobody knows for certain where Mr Pu
tin was when his army attacked Ukraine.Number of Javelin anti-tank missiles given to
Ukraine by America.Source: White House4,
Melitopol Mariupol
MykolaivOdessa KhersonDnipro
Zaporizhia HuliapoleChernihiv
Sumy
Okhtyrka
Myrhorod
Kharkiv
IzyumLvivKyivChisinauBlack
SeaSea of
AzovDnieper
UKRAINEBELARUSSLOVAKIAMOLDOVARUSSIA
CrimeaUkrainian territory
annexed byRussiaLuhanskD netskArea controlled
by Russian-backed
separatists
before Feb 24thTransnistria150 km
Russian missile, artillery
and air strikes
March rd-th
< Claimed asRussian-controlled
AssessedRussian advances*Assessed asRussian-controlledUnit movements
Russian UkrainianClaimed Ukrainian counteroffensivesMarch th *Russia operated in or attacked,but does
not control Sources: Institute for the
Study ofWar; AEI’s Critical ThreatsProject;
Rochan Consulting; OspreyFlight SolutionsThe fifth week of war: The military situation The relief of KyivOn March 31st British defence intelligence
predicted “heavy fighting” in Kyiv’s
suburbs in the coming days, even as
Russian troops began withdrawing north.
Ukrainian forces launched counterattacks
around the country.Ukraine said it had driven Russian forces
out of the town of Irpin, on the north-
western fringes of Kyiv, and had repelled
the invaders even further to the north-
east of the city. Russia claimed it had
never intended to capture the city.