The Economist - UK (2022-04-02)

(Antfer) #1

40 The Americas TheEconomistApril2nd 2022


CentralAmerica

Injudiciousjudges


“T


helawisa business,”saysJuan,a
34­year­old who sells legal docu­
ments,includingcopiesoftheconstitu­
tion,ona busystreetoppositeGuatemala’s
highestcourt.“ThelawsI selldon’tapply;
ratherthosewithmoneygettheirway.”It is
a commonviewina countryinwhichgun­
totingmensometimesguardjudicialoffic­
es,ostensiblytoprotecttheirinhabitants.
CorruptionandimpunitydamageCen­
tralAmericainmanyways,fromthedrain
ofpublicfundsintoprivatepocketstoa
dearthofinvestmentowingtounreliable
justicesystems.IntheNorthernTriangle
countriesofGuatemala,HondurasandEl
Salvador,some$13bneachyearisstolen
throughcorruption,estimatestheCouncil
onForeignRelations,a think­tankinNew
York.Thatdoesnotincludetaxevasionor
forgoneinvestment.
In FebruaryEl Faro, an investigative
outletbasedinElSalvador,publishedalle­
gationsthatAlejandroGiammattei,Guate­
mala’s president, received illicit funds dur­
ing his presidential campaign in 2019. (He
denies wrongdoing.) On February 15th Juan
Orlando Hernández, a former president of
Honduras,  was  arrested  on  suspicion  of
aiding drug gangs. He will be extradited to
the United States. Last year Mr Hernández’s
brother  was  sentenced  to  life  imprison­
ment in New York for drug­trafficking.
It  is  highly  unlikely  that  either  Mr
Giammattei  or  Mr  Hernández  will  be
charged  in  his  home  country.  In  2019  Mr

G UATEMALACITY
Legalsystemsarecorruptandjudges
frequentlyintimidated

Erika Aifán, forced to flee

mer  left­wing  president,  introduced  a  se­
ries of reforms, these schools often select­
ed students using their own criteria, such
as  primary­school  grades  or  whether  par­
ents were married in the Catholic church.
They could also charge top­up fees.
A  study  from  2016  by  Gregory  Elacqua
and  Humberto  Santos,  two  academics  in
Chile,  compared  the  degree  to  which  rich
and  poor  kids  were  educated  separately
under the voucher system in Santiago with
what would have occurred if students had
attended  the  school  nearest  their  homes.
They  concluded  that  schools  were  more
segregated  than  neighbourhoods.  This
contradicts the claim that voucher schools
simply reflect the societies they serve. 
Richer  Chileans  also  do  better  at  uni­
versity.  In  order  to  get  into  one,  students
must take an admissions test similar to the
satin the United States. More than half of
those  who  achieve  top  scores  come  from
the  10%  who  go  to  elite  (ie,  non­voucher)
private schools. Students who do not score
well largely end up in less prestigious tech­
nical  institutes.  This  means  that  many
poorer  students  finish  higher  education
with big debts and degrees that employers
do not value much. Fully 54% of students
who have taken out the main student loan
have defaulted or are in arrears, compared
with 32% of student debtors in America.
Successive  presidents  have  tinkered
with the system. Sebastián Piñera, the cen­
tre­right  president  during  the  protests  in
2011, lowered the interest rate on the main
student loan from 6% to 2%. In 2016 Ms Ba­
chelet made university free for the poorest
60%  of  students.  This  bung  to  students
was popular, even if the reform meant that
there was probably less public money than
there might have been for primary and sec­
ondary  education.  Between  2012  and  2018
public  spending  on  tertiary  education  in­
creased  more  in  Chile  than  in  any  other
oecdcountry,  while  public  spending  on
non­tertiary  education  increased  only
somewhat faster than the oecdaverage. 
Mr  Boric  has  promised  to  improve
state­run  primary  and  secondary  schools,
but has so far provided few details. He has
pledged to continue some of Ms Bachelet’s
reforms, alongside increasing funding for
public  nurseries.  However,  he  also  wants
to  remove  “market  dynamics”  in  educa­
tion,  meaning  competition.  He  wants  to
eliminate some standardised tests and re­
place an “extensive and content­filled cur­
riculum”  with  one  that  emphasises  cre­
ativity,  gender,  multiculturalism  and  the
environment.  Some  teacher  evaluations
could be scrapped. 
Fabián  Guajardo  of  Nodo  xxi,  a  leftist
think­tank,  says  this  will  reduce  pressure
on  teachers  and  students,  something  the
teachers’ unions have long favoured. Cris­
tián Cox Donoso of Diego Portales Univer­
sity in Santiago likens it to “tearing down a

building  that  has  taken  two  decades  to
build”.  Policymakers  need  “to  know  every
year if reading, maths, science, history and
social­science  targets  are  being  achieved
or not, to help them to respond better,” he
says,  but  “the  romantic  left...wants  to  get
rid  of  this.”  The  new  education  minister
used to be a teacher.
Mr  Boric  also  plans  to  forgive  all  stu­
dent  debt  and  extend  the  free  public  col­
lege scheme. His team puts the cost of for­
giving  student  debt  at  $4.7bn.  Other  esti­
mates are higher, if defaulted debts that are
already  being  paid  off  by  the  state  are  in­
cluded.  In  December  Mr  Boric  estimated
that  the  total  cost  of  the  policy  would  be
$12bn,  or  3.4%  of  gdp.  The  details  of  the
plan  are  still  being  hashed  out,  but  it  is
likely to be implemented over 20 years. 
Mario  Marcel,  the  new  finance  minis­
ter,  appears  to  understand  that  forgiving
student  debt  is  a  sop  to  the  middle  class.
“What  one  wouldn’t  want  is  for  student
debt forgiveness to be paid for by workers
or slum­dwellers,” he says. He believes the
policy  should  be  funded  by  raising  taxes.
He aims to raise the total tax take from 21%
of gdpto 26% in four years.
It will be hard for Mr Boric to back down
from these promises. His supporters want
their student loans written off, and will be
furious  if  they  are  not.  As  the  new  presi­
dent  knows  all  too  well,  young,educated
Chileans  are  not  afraid  tomaketheir  dis­
content heard on the streets. n

The legacy of the Chicago school

Sources:OECD;UNESCOInstituteforStatistics

*Chargedbypublicinstitutionstonationalstudents
†Purchasing-powerparity ‡Populationwithinfiveyears
ofsecondary-schoolgraduationage

Germany

France

SouthKorea

Australia

Canada

Japan

Ireland

Chile

UnitedStates

England

129630

Average annual bachelor’s degree tuition fees*
2020-2 academic year or latest available, $’000 at PPP†

100
80
60
40
20
0
1910200090801970

Tertiary education, gross enrolment ratio‡, %

United States
Britain

Chile

Brazil

Argentina
Free download pdf