The Economist - UK (2022-04-02)

(Antfer) #1
The Economist April 2nd 2022 Finance & economics 65

morepromise.Thatisbecausetheeuap­
pearsreadytojettisonitsmisguidedhos­
tilitytolong­termgascontracts,whichit
had discouraged as part ofits effortto
boostspotmarketsforgas.Theintenthad
beentopromotecompetition,but,aslast
winter’srocketinggaspricesrevealed,it al­
soleftEuropebadlyexposedtoasupply
shock.Asa topAmericanlngexporterex­
plains,Europefocusedonexpandingthe
spotmarketwhenitshouldhavesecured
“fantastic”long­termpricinginstead.
Nowthecommissionsaysitwillen­
couragelong­termcontracts“tosupportfi­
nalinvestmentdecisionsonbothlngex­
port and import infrastructure”. That
shouldgiveinvestorsinAmericanexport
facilitiestheconfidencetospendthebil­
lions required, boosting transatlantic
trade.GilesFarrerofWoodMackenzie,a
consultancy,reckonsthattheinfrastruc­

tureneededtoachievetheaimof50bncu­
bic metres of liquefaction capacity in
Americawouldcostroughly$25bn,notin­
cluding upstream investments andsup­
ply­chain inflation. Rystad thinks the
spending neededtomeetEurope’s extra
demandcouldbeintheregionof$35bn.
DiversificationawayfromRussiainthe
longterm,then,maybepossible.Butthat
doeslittletohelpwiththeshort­termpro­
blemofanaggressiveMrPutin.Arational
calculussuggeststhatheshouldbeunwill­
ingtoturnoffthetaps,consideringhepro­
fitshandsomelyfromhighprices.Energy
Intelligence,anindustrypublisher,reck­
onsGazpromearned$20.5bnfromEuro­
peangassalesinthefirsttwomonthsof
theyear,nearlyasmuchasitmadefrom
Europeinallof2020.Butfewobservers
woulddareto predictthe actionsofan
increasinglyerraticdictator. n

Russianoil(1)

Diversionary tactics


O


n february 22 nd,  two  days  before
Russia  invaded  Ukraine,  a  German­
flagged  vessel  left  the  Russian  port  of  Pri­
morsk  loaded  with  33,000  tonnes  of  oil.
When it reached Tranmere, a British oil ter­
minal,  on  March  3rd,  it  received  a  frosty
welcome. Some dockers refused to unload
the  freight  when  they  learnt  where  it  had
come  from.  Similar  boycotts  have  sprung
up  elsewhere.  Kayrros,  a  data  firm,  esti­
mates  that  the volume  of  oil  “on  water”
rose by nearly 13% in the fortnight after the
invasion, in large part as undelivered Rus­
sian cargo sought new takers. The number
of vessels returning to Russia also jumped.

Most  of  what  has  flowed  out  of  Russia
in  recent  weeks  was  bought  and  paid  for
before the war started. Now less oil is leav­
ing  the  country  in  the  first  place.  Worries
about  sanctions  and  bad  publicity  have
prompted many buyers to pause purchas­
es.  On  March  24th  the  volume  of  Russian
seaborne  oil  exports,  at  2.3m  barrels  per
day (bpd), was nearly 2m below the level on
March  1st,  reckons  Kpler,  a  data  firm.  As
those barrels fail to sell, the price of Brent
crudeis nearing $115. Yet for the countries
willing  to  risk  opprobrium  and  jump
through  new  logistical  hoops,  Russian  oil
is beginning to look like a bargain. 

The partial embargo of Russia has ech­
oes with the blockade of Iran by the West in
the  2010s,  which  led  the  Islamic  Republic
to put together an unrivalled playbook for
smuggling  oil.  In  May  2018  America  im­
posed  “maximum  pressure”  sanctions,
with the aim of halting Iran’s oil exports al­
together.  It  almost  succeeded:  by  October
2019  they  had  fallen  to  an  average  of
260,000  bpd,  from  2.3m  before  the  sanc­
tions.  Since  then,  however,  they  have  re­
vived a little, averaging 850,000 bpd in the
three months to February 2022. 
Iran  manages  to  sell  oil  through  two
channels.  The  first  is  through  authorised
but restricted sales. As it imposed its sanc­
tions America granted a limited exemption
to eight importing countries. There is a big
catch, however: the sales have to be made
in  the  buyers’  currency  and  either  kept  in
escrow accounts at local banks or spent on
a  list  of  goods  produced  locally.  For  Iran
that  is  deeply  frustrating.  In  December  it
was forced to accept tea from Sri Lanka as
payment for an oil debt valued at $251m.
To  circumvent  the  restrictions  Iran
smuggles vast quantities of oil—its second
channel  for  sales.  Iranian  tankers  sail  to
America’s  foes,  such  as  Venezuela,  with
their transponders turned off. Some are re­
painted  to  hide  their  provenance.  Others
transfer their cargo in the high seas, often
at night, to ships sailing under a different
flag. Oil is also moved over land by smug­
gling  gangs,  says  Julia  Friedlander,  a  for­
mer intelligence official now at the Atlan­
tic  Council,  a  think­tank  in  Washington.
Petroleum  is  bartered  with  China,  Turkey
and the United Arab Emirates against gold,
pesticides  and  even  housing  projects  in
Tehran.  Traders  in  Dubai,  home  to  half  a
million Iranians, blend crude from the Is­
lamic  Republic  with  other,  similar  grades
which they then rebrand as Kuwaiti oil.
Russia  is  unlikely  to  take  a  leaf  out  of
Iran’s  book,  mainly  because,  for  now,  it
doesn’t need to. The penalties imposed on
Iran  include  secondary  sanctions  that
threaten third­country banks dealing with
it with huge fines. That makes overtly buy­
ing its oil risky. By contrast, Russia faces a
weaker embargo. Only America, which did
not buy much to begin with, has banned its
oil. On March 25th Germany said it would
cut  its  purchases  by  half,  but  it  is  unclear
when  that  would  start.  Sales  transmitted
through pipelines, which are less conspic­
uous than shipments and represent about
a fifth of Russia’s total exports of crude, are
still flowing. Secondary sanctions have not
been imposed. 
Instead seaborne exports have cratered
because Western buyers, such as big ener­
gy firms, fear a public backlash. They also
face logistical headaches as cautious banks
cut  credit,  ship  owners  struggle  to  obtain
insurance and freight costs soar. And each
time  sanctions  are  tweaked,  says  Antonia

H ONG KONG
What can Russia do to sell its unwanted oil?
Free download pdf