Maximum PC - UK (2019-09)

(Antfer) #1
AFTER MONTHS OF WAITING and
speculation, AMD’s Radeon RX 5700 XT is
finally here, joining the ranks of the best
graphics cards. Sporting a new RDNA
architecture that boosts performance
while reducing power requirements,
and with a price drop to keep AMD
competitive with Nvidia’s new RTX 2060
Super, expectations from the faithful have
been high. This is AMD’s first new GPU
architecture since 2012, and the company
has focused on improving efficiency,
reworking the Compute Units to boost
utilization and performance, and shifting
to TSMC’s 7nm process technology.
All three RX 5700 models use the
same Navi 10 GPU, with the 5700 X T cards
sporting fully enabled chips, while the RX
5700 disables four CUs and 256 cores.
Clock speeds also vary, but the GDDR6
memory in all cases runs at 14Gb/s. The
new Navi 10 GPUs end up with a die size
slightly larger than the previous Polaris
GPUs, with only a few extra CUs. However,
each CU has been reworked with the new
RDNA architecture, and the result is that
even with fewer cores, the RX 5700 XT
easily outperforms the Vega 64—and
does so using substantially less power.
AMD says the new cooling is better than
its previous-generation cards, but we’re
not fully convinced. It’s not extremely
loud, but that probably has more to do
with the lower power requirements than
any massive change in the cooling design.
Idle noise and thermals tend to be about
the same for most GPUs, but playing a
game is a different matter. Compared to

A compelling blend of 7nm technology, RDNA


architecture updates, and a last-minute price drop


AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT


8


VERDICT AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT

NA’VI More efficient RDNA
architecture; beats Vega 64
and 2060 Super; good performance at both
1080p and 1440p.
UNOBTAINIUM No ray-tracing support;
higher temps and power than Nvidia;
“dented” shroud looks weird.
$400, http://www.amd.com

the RTX 2060 Super, the RX 5700 XT runs
just as quiet, but uses about 25W more
power, and runs about 11 C hotter.
Just because pricing is the same on the
RX 5700 XT and RTX 2060 Super, it doesn’t
mean performance, features, and API
support are the same. AMD has opted not
to support ray tracing here—there’s no
hardware-level RT acceleration and
no Tensor processing clusters for AI
and machine learning. Just as critically,
even though it’s possible to support DXR
via drivers and shader calculations, AMD
isn’t doing that either (at least not yet). If
you want an AMD GPU with hardware DXR
support, you need to wait for Navi 20.

FAST VS. FEATURES
Performance is close enough that it
shouldn’t be the overriding factor when
choosing between AMD and Nvidia.
AMD is slightly faster and uses slightly
more power, while Nvidia counters with
features such as DXR support that AMD
currently chooses to ignore. The RX 5700
XT easily handles 1080p ultra and even
1440p ultra. There may be individual
games where settings will have to be
dropped if you want a steady 60fps at
1440p, but in most games, the 5700 XT
is hitting 60fps, and in some cases, even
100fps or more is viable.
There’s plenty to like with AMD’s new
Navi GPUs and the RDNA architecture.
Performance and efficiency are
substantially improved relative to the
previous-generation Vega and Polaris
cards. Some of that is thanks to the

SPECIFICATIONS

GPU Navi 10
Lithography 7nm
Transistor Count 10.3 billion
CUDA Cores 2,560
Texture Units^160
ROPs 64
Core/Boost Clock 1,605/1,905MHz
Memory Capacity & Type 8GB GDDR6
Memory Speed 14GT/s
Memory Bus 256-bit

AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT Nvidia GeForce RTX 2070
Tom Clancy’s The Division 2 (Avg fps) 106 / 69 100/66
Assassin’s Creed Odyssey (Avg fps) 69 /54 66/ 56
Far Cry 5 (Avg fps) 127 / 103 125/93
Shadow of the Tomb Raider (Avg fps) 126 / 97 115/86
Middle Earth: Shadow of War (Avg fps) 107/69 108 / 77
Metro Exodus (Avg fps) 78 / 65 77/58
Total War: Warhammer II (Avg fps) 87/67 99 / 81

BENCHMARKS

Best scores are in bold. Our test bed consists of an Intel Core i7-8700K, 16GB of G.Skill DDR4-3200, a Gigabyte
Z370 Aorus Gaming 7, and a 1TB Samsung Evo M.2 SSD. All games are tested at their highest graphical profile
with AA turned on, at 1080p and 1440p respectively.

7nm manufacturing process, a good
portion is thanks to the architectural
improvements, and the reduced launch
price is certainly a step in the right
direction. The Navi GPUs have some
features that could be worth exploring,
including anti-lag, FidelityFX, and Radeon
Image Sharpening (for games that don’t
directly include FidelityFX support).
The good news is that AMD is now
competitive with Nvidia’s lower-tier
RTX cards, in both performance and
pricing. It still can’t touch the RTX 2080
and 2080 Ti, but it doesn’t really need to
right now. Some people might be willing
to spend $700 or $1,200 on an extreme
graphics card, but far more people will be
interested in a $350-$400 high-end card.
For those users, AMD’s Radeon RX 5700
XT is a welcome addition. You may not get
fancy ray-tracing support, but if you’ve
been hoping for a new graphics card
upgrade that doesn’t require supporting
Nvidia, this is currently the best AMD
has to offer, and it’s definitely worth
considering. –JARRED WALTON

maximumpc.com SEP 2019 MAXIMUMPC 75

Free download pdf