All_About_Space_-_Issue_94_2020

(singke) #1

©
x3


images


NASA


year, to eight years later, humans on the Moon.
I've been working in the space industry my whole
career, and we've not done anything like that. I was
saying 2024, five years away, that's challenging. It
is unbelievable what they did with the technology
that they had then, but it was that naivety, that
challenge, that risk that took them there. I still
can't believe, when you look back at it now, what
was achieved.

What’s changed since then? Have we become
more risk averse?
LJ: What drove the Apollo Moon landings was
political, and huge amounts of money went into it.
If we put that amount of money into the manned
space programme today, we could do it again, but
there are other challenges. Other things that we
want to spend – should be spending – taxpayers
money on as well. It's a question of political as
well as scientific demand, and all of these things
at different times come together. We've learnt now
how to live and work in low-Earth orbit on the
International Space Station. So really, we've had this
horizon goal of getting humans to Mars, and the
Moon is the next step on that journey.

If we get to go back to the Moon and carry on
that work, what kinds of things can we learn?
MA: One of the things that I mentioned, that in
the last ten years we didn't know about for 40
years. We had those samples in 1969, but it was not
until 2008 that it became obvious that those rocks
did contain water. Yes, and you may ask, “Why
didn't we know?”
Well we didn't know because we didn't have the
technology. Also another reason is about human
behaviour, as we are very set in our ways and the
way we do things, right? If somebody says that this
thing is this, we don't question it often. Because as
soon as the Apollo samples came back in the 1960s
and early 1970s, they didn’t know there was water
in those samples because they didn’t find them,
because they didn't have the right technologies or
they didn't look hard enough with the technology
that they had. Some people actually did find that it
looked like water on Earth. And so they said: “No,
that is contamination from somewhere in Houston
[Texas] or Pasadena [California], and Moon has no
water. It’s dead.”
It took 40 years for somebody to question
that. We could question that because we now
have much more sophisticated instrumentation,
much more sensitive instrumentation and a
better understanding of what we are looking for.
Lo-and-behold, we did find water in the Moon, and
that was a game-changer. Now we are trying to
understand where this water came from.
It also turns out that the water on the Moon is
very similar to water on Earth. So it is a surprise
that in 1960, people did find some water. They just
couldn't commit [to the idea] and they just thought
it was from Earth, so why is it that important.

Is there a practical importance in using the water
found on the Moon?
LJ: That is one of the challenges that we’ve got. In
fact, the missions, as I mentioned, at the minute

Relive Apollo 11
8 Days:TotheMoonandBack, a drama-
documentarybytheBBCwhichusesthe
declassifiedaudiofromtheApollo 11 mission
andretellstheworld’smostfamousstoryof
high-stakeexploration,isa newandinnovative
waytotellthetale.AvailableonBBCiPlayer.

Above
(clockwise):
The Lunar
Gateway is the
next major
project in
making lunar
travel more
sustainable

A lunar
sample taken
from Apollo 14

Extensive
amounts of
samples were
taken from
the Apollo 11
landing site

NASA has said it wants to put humans on the
Moon by 2024, and it's ambitious. It's got to find
the funding, but certainly the world's agencies are
going back to the Moon, and we will see that in the
coming years. It's a hugely exciting time in space
exploration, and I can't believe I get to be a part of
it either really.

Can you tell us briefly about the Lunar Gateway?
Is it going to orbit the Moon or will it be on the
lunar surface?
LJ: It’s going to be orbiting the Moon in a very
elliptical orbit. So not like we're used to now, with
the International Space Station going around
the Earth, but it's going to be much smaller than
the International Space Station. The ISS is about

100 metres [330 feet] long, and the size of a five-
bedroom house. This Gateway is going to be like a
bijou studio f lat.
The science capacity with it at the minute, we're
talking about a metre [three feet] cubed – it is tiny.
But it will allow us to be a staging post to return
humans down to the surface and to let us study
the Moon and Earth and learn how to live in that
very strange environment beyond the safety of
our magnetic field, which protects us from all the
cosmic radiation.

How far have we come in sending humans safely
into space and back home again since Apollo 11?
LJ: It blows my mind that we went from no
humans in space in 1961, the beginning of that

© BBC Studios

Interview Apollo lessons

Free download pdf