CHAPTER 3 DIAGNOSTIC CULTURE AND IDENTIFICATION (BACTERIAL AND FUNGAL) 29
Examine directly under the microscope and/or gently press samples onto test
medium.
Toothbrush (Figure 3.3):
Samples from large or poorly demarcated lesions may be collected with a sterile
(or new “in package”) toothbrush
Brush hair against the direction of growth to encourage removal of fragile
(infected) hair shafts
Gently stab the bristles into the test media – a large amount of debris does not
need to be transferred.
Colony Growth and Identification
Monitor culture plates for color change and colony growth daily.
Observe for growth up to 28 days.
DTM color changes from yellow to redprior toorat the same time asmacroscopic
colony growth.
Dermatophytes preferentially metabolize proteins in the medium, creating an alkaline
pH turning the yellow color of the DTM to red at the same time that the dermatophyte
colony appears; most other fungi metabolize carbohydrates in the media first, creating
an acidic environment with no color changebut over time,they will consume the
proteins and cause a red color change,
Dermatophyte colonies are white, creamy, or lightly tan but not pigmented (Figure
3.4).
Colonies may be cottony, wool-like, or powdery.
Fungal Identification
Transfer colonies to a glass slide using clear acetate tape or a sterile loop.
Lactophenol cotton blue stain is most often recommended to enhance the appearance
of hyphae and conidia, but any dark stain will suffice (Figure 3.5).
Examine slides for hyphae, macroconidia, and/or microconidia for identification (Fig-
ure 3.6).
Microsporum canis,Microsporum gypseum,andTrichophyton mentagrophytesare the
most common dermatophytes isolated from lesions of dogs;Microsporum canisis most
commonly isolated from cats.
Colonies that cannot be identified should be submitted to a reference laboratory for
identification; consult with your laboratory prior to submitting samples.
A multicenter study compared the interpretation skills of “ in-house” cultures by
clinicians (dermatologists and general practitioners) with reference mycology lab-
oratory results: specialists (dermatologists) demonstrated a 3% error rate while
general practitioners misdiagnosed 20% of the cases. This discrepancy may be
due to a lack of microscopic identification or erroneous medium color change
notation.