In many of the following cited studies, spe-
cies in the Blastocladiales are still classified with
the Chytridiomycota; however, in Fig.7.2they
are classified according to their present place-
ment in Blastocladiomycota. Nuclear genes,
such as rDNA and protein-coding genes, have
been used with varying levels of success to clas-
sify the basal fungi. James et al. ( 2000 )usedsmall
subunit (SSU) rDNA (18S rDNA) sequences to
produce the first well-sampled phylogeny of zoo-
sporic true fungi and addressed the phylogenetic
consistency of zoospore discharge type, thallus
a Basidiomycota
Ascomycota
Glomeromycota
Monoblepharidales
Neocallimastigomycotina +
remaining Chytridiomycota
Choanoflagellida
BLASTOCLADIOMYCOTA
Entomophthoromycotina
Kickxellales + Zoopagales
+ Harpellales
Mucoromycotina
b
Basidiomycota
Ascomycota
Kickxellomycotina
Entomophthoromycotina
Glomeromycota
BLASTOCLADIOMYCOTA
Mucoromycotina
Chytridiomycota
Microsporidia
d
Basidiomycota
Ascomycota
Mucoromycotina
BLASTOCLADIOMYCOTA
Chytridiomycota
Holozoa
c
Ascomycota
Mucoromycotina
BLASTOCLADIOMYCOTA
Chytridiomycota
Holozoa
Basidiomycota
e
Basidiomycota
Ascomycota
Mucormycotina
Glomeromycota
Mucoromycotina
Entomophthoromycotina
BLASTOCLADIOMYCOTA
Neocallimastigomycota
Chytridiomycota
Nucleariida
Nuclear g
enes
Mitochondrial genes
Pan genomic sampling
Fig. 7.2Hypothesized phylogenetic placements of Blas-
tocladiomycota among fungi. (a) James et al. ( 2000 )
with SSU rDNA analyzed using maximum parsimony.
(b) Liu et al. ( 2006 ) with RPB1+RPB2 concatenated
protein sequences analyzed using Bayesian inference
and maximum parsimony. (c,d) Lang et al. ( 2002 )
with 11 concatenated mtDNA proteins analyzed using
maximum likelihood (c) or a distance method (d). (e)
Liu et al. ( 2009 ) with 150 concatenated proteins (40,925
amino acids) analyzed using Bayesian inference and
maximum likelihood. Dashed lines: branches whose
placement in phylogeny was not strongly supported
by bootstrap analyses (< 70 %)
Blastocladiomycota 183