The Traditional Ecological Knowledge of the Solega A Linguistic Perspective

(Dana P.) #1
243


  1. Zaraska N. Health behaviours of the Soliga tribe women. Kingston, ON: Queen’s University;
    1997.

  2. Go I. A-11 state primary census abstract for individual scheduled tribe. New Delhi: Offi ce of
    the Registrar General and Census Commissioner; 2001. [cited 2011 06–10-11], Available
    from http://censusindia.gov.in/Tables_Published/SCST/scst_main.html.

  3. India Go. T 00-006: Number of literates and literacy rate by sex. New Delhi: Offi ce of the
    Registrar General & Census Commissioner; 2001. [cited 2011 06–10-11], Available from:
    http://www.censusindia.gov.in/Tables_Published/A-Series/A-Series_links/t_00_006.aspx.

  4. India Go. Sub-Districts area profi le. New Delhi: Offi ce of the Registrar General & Census
    Commissioner; 2001. Available from: http://www.censusindia.gov.in/Census_Data_2001/
    Census_Data_Online/Area_Profi le/SubDistrict_Profi le.aspx?cki=EVUSTZfgPoa.

  5. India Go. Karnataka - data highlights: scheduled tribes. New Delhi: Offi ce of the Registrar
    General & Census Commissioner; 2001. [cited 2011 06–10-11], Available from: http://cen-
    susindia.gov.in/Tables_Published/SCST/scst_main.html.

  6. Hiremath A, Sundaram B. The fi re-Lantana cycle hypothesis in Indian forests. Conserv Soc.
    2005;3(1):26–42.

  7. Kothari A, Rai N. Biligiri Tiger Reserve: include Soligas in conservation plan. Deccan
    Herald. 2011; 09/02/2011.

  8. Atran S. Folk biology and the anthropology of science: cognitive universals and cultural
    particulars. Behav Brain Sci. 1988;21:547–609.

  9. Evans N, Levinson S. The myth of language universals: language diversity and its importance
    for cognitive science. Behav Brain Sci. 2009;32(5):429.

  10. Croft W. Typology and universals. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2003.

  11. Greenberg J. Language universals: with special reference to feature hierarchies. The Hague:
    Mouton; 1966.

  12. Burenhult N, Levinson S. Language and landscape: a cross-linguistic perspective. Lang Sci.
    2008;30(2-3):135–50.

  13. Enfi eld N, Majid A, Staden M. Cross-linguistic categorisation of the body: introduction.
    Lang Sci. 2006;28:137–47.

  14. Berlin B, Kay P. Basic color terms: their universality and evolution. Berkeley, CA: University
    of California Press; 1969.

  15. Dedrick D. Naming the rainbow: colour language, colour science, and culture. London:
    Kluwer Academic; 1998.

  16. Lucy J. The linguistics of “color”. In: Hardin CL, Maffi L, editors. Color categories in thought
    and language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1997. p. 320–46.

  17. Wierzbicka A. Shape and colour in language and thought. In: Schalley AC, Khlentzos D, edi-
    tors. Mental states, Language and cognitive structure, vol. 2. Philadelphia: John Benjamins;
    2007. p. 37–60.

  18. Davidoff J, Davies I, Roberson D. Colour categories in a stone-age tribe. Nature.
    1999;398:203–4.

  19. Kay P, Regier T. Language, thought and color: recent developments. Trends Cogn Sci.
    2006;10(2):51–4.

  20. Kay P, Regier T. Color naming universals: the case of Berinmo. Cognition.
    2007;102(2):289–98.

  21. Brown C. Mode of subsistence and folk biological taxonomy. Curr Anthropol.
    1985;26(1):43–64.

  22. Ereshefsky M. The poverty of the Linnean hierarchy. Cambridge: Cambridge University
    Press; 2001.

  23. Mayden R. A hierarchy of species concepts: the denouement in the sage of the species prob-
    lem. In: Claridge M, Dawah H, Wilson M, editors. Species: the units of biodiversity. London:
    Chapman and Hall; 1997. p. 381–424.

  24. Agapow P, Bininda-Emonds O, Crandall K, Gittleman J, Mace G, Marshall J, et al. The
    impact of species concept on biodiversity studies. Q Rev Biol. 2004;79(2):161–79.


References

Free download pdf