244
- Cavalier-Smith T. Only six kingdoms of life. Proc R Soc Lond. 2004;271:1251–62.
- Viruel J, Segarra-Moragues J, Perez-Collazos E, Villar L, Catalan P. Systematic revision of
the Epipetrum group of Dioscorea (Dioscoreaceae) endemic to Chile. Syst Bot.
2010;35(1):40–63. - Brunner S. Fur seals and sea lions (Otariidae): identifi cation of species and taxonomic review.
Syst Biodivers. 2004;1(3):339–439. - Balakrishnan R. Species concepts, species boundaries and species identifi cation: a view from
the tropics. Syst Biol. 2005;54(4):689–93. - Walters S. Tansley Review 6 - The name of the rose: a review of ideas on the European bias
in angiosperm classifi cation. New Phytol. 1986;104:527–46. - Mitchell A. Systematic relationships of New Zealand endemic Brassicaceae inferred from
nrDNA ITS sequence data. Syst Bot. 2000;25(1):98–105. - Walters S. The shaping of angiosperm taxonomy. New Phytol. 1961;60(1):74–84.
- Clayton W. The genus concept in practice. Kew Bull. 1982;38:149–53.
- Willis JC. The birth and spread of plants. Boissiera. 1949;8.
- Cronk Q. The name of the pea: a quantitative history of legume classifi cation. New Phytol.
1990;116(1):13–175. - Cronk Q. Measurement of biological and historical infl uences on plant classifi cations. Taxon.
1989;38(3):357–70. - Bartlett H. The concept of the genus: I. History of the generic concept in botany. Bull Torrey
Bot Club. 1940;67(5):349–62. - DeQuieroz K. Ernst Mayr and the modern concept of species. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA.
2005;102 Suppl 1:6600–7. - DeQuieroz K, Gauthier J. Phylogenetic taxonomy. Annu Rev Ecol Syst. 1992;23:449–80.
- Gaston K, May R. Taxonomy of taxonomists. Nature. 1992;356:281–2.
- Younger B. The segregation of items into categories by 10-month-old infants. Child Dev.
1985;56:1574–83. - Vauclair J. Categorization and conceptual behavior in nonhuman primates. In: Bekoff M,
Allen C, Burghardt GM, editors. The cognitive animal: empirical and theoretical perspectives
on animal cognition. Cambridge: MIT Press; 2002. - Thompson R, Oden D. Categorical perception and conceptual judgments by nonhuman pri-
mates: the paleological monkey and the analogical ape. Cogn Sci. 2000;24(3):363–96. - Benard J, Stach S, Giurfa M. Categorization of visual stimuli in the honeybee Apis mellifera.
Anim Cogn. 2006;9:257–70. - Avargues-Weber A, Portelli G, Benard J, Dyer A, Giurfa M. Confi gural processing enables
discrimination and categorization of face-like stimuli in honeybees. J Exp Biol.
2010;213:593–601. - Nazzi T, Gopnik A. Linguistic and cognitive abilities in infancy: when does language become
a tool for categorization? Cognition. 2001;80(3):B11–20. - Plunkett K, Hu J-F, Cohen L. Labels can override perceptual categories in early infancy.
Cognition. 2008;106:665–81. - Cain AJ. The genus in evolutionary taxonomy. Syst Zool. 1956;5:97–109.
- Stross B. Acquisition of botanical terminology by Tzeltal children. In: Edmonson M, editor.
Meaning in Mayan languages. Hague: Mouton; 1973. p. 107–41. - Brown C. Linguistic ethnobiology: Amerindian oak nomenclature. In: Ford R, editor.
Ethnobiology at the millennium: past promise and future prospects. Ann Arbor, MI:
University of Michigan; 2001. - Stevens P. Review of Ethnobiological Classifi cation - B. Berlin, 1992. Syst Biol.
1994;43(2):293–5. - Zarger R, Stepp J. Persistence of botanical knowledge among Tzeltal Maya children. Curr
Anthropol. 2004;45(3):413–8. - Quinn P, Johnson M. Global-before-basic object categorization in connectionist networks
and 2-month-old infants. Infancy. 2000;1(1):31–46.
References