New Horizons in Insect Science Towards Sustainable Pest Management

(Barry) #1

144 A. D. N. T. Kumara et al.


Relationship with Climatic Factors

The 2-year survey indicated that the insect species
and their abundance varied throughout the year.
Compared to the mean number of insects with the
season, P. moesta (F = 3.505, p = 0.034), G. punc-
tifer (F = 8.653, p = 0.001), R. dorsalis (F = 5.015
p = 0.009), Cixiid sp. (F = 4.732, p = 0.012) were
significantly different in the four seasons. Their
abundance was generally higher in rainy seasons,
and the number gradually declined with the reduc-
tion of rainfall (Fig. 3 ). However, only P. moesta
and Proutista sp. followed the rainfall pattern
(Fig. 4) (Pearson Correlation coefficient = 0.460,
p = 0.012, R^2 =^ 0.47). The average atmospheric
temperature is not significantly different in the
four seasons, and there is no correlation with in-
sect and the atmospheric average temperature
(F = 0.264, p = 0.613). S. typica showed negative
relationship with rainfall but this relationship is


not significantly correlated (Fig. 4 ). In addition,
there is a significant correlation of abundance pat-
tern between insect species. The similar trends
were observed in an individual species with others
of their abundance in the field i.e. R. dorsalis and
G. punctifer (Pearson Correlation coefficient =
0.460, p = .012, R^2 =^ 0.47) also, K. ceylonica and
Proutista sp. (Pearson Correlation coefficient =
0.455, p = 0.025, R^2 =^ 0.41), N. nervosa correlate
with (Fig. 4 ) I. clypialis (Pearson Correlation
coefficient = 0.744, p = 0.001) and Cixiid spe-
cies (Pearson Correlation coefficient = 0.712, p =
0.001), and Proutista sp. also correlated with the
N. nervosa, (Pearson Correlation coefficient =
0.368, p = 0.038) I. clypialis (Pearson Correlation
coefficient = 0.376, p = 0.033) as well as K. cey-
lonica (Pearson Correlation coefficient = 0.455,
p = 0.013). The above data indicated that all puta-
tive vectors followed the same trend in the field
(Fig. 4 ) and their abundance is related to the rain-
fall pattern, but all the data were not significantly

ρϬ

ϭϬϬ

ϭρϬ

ϮϬϬ

ϮρϬ

ϯϬϬ

ϯρϬ

ϮϬ

κϬ

ςϬ

ϬϭϮϯκρ

DĞĂŶŶƵŵďĞƌŽĨ/ŶƐĞĐƚƐ

DĞĂŶƌĂŝŶĨĂůů; ŵŵͿ

^ĞĂƐŽŶ
Đdž Ɛƚ ƌĨ

ρϬ

ϭϬϬ

ϭρϬ

ϮϬϬ

ϮρϬ

ϯϬϬ

ϯρϬ

ϭϬ

ϮϬ

ϯϬ

κϬ

ϬϭϮϯκρ

DĞĂŶŶƵŵďĞƌŽĨ/ŶƐĞĐƚƐ

DĞĂŶƌĂŝŶĨĂůů; ŵŵͿ

^ĞĂƐŽŶ
ŶŶ ŝĐ ŐƉ ƌĨ

DĞĂŶŶƵŵďĞƌŽĨ/ŶƐĞĐƚƐ ρϬ

ϭϬϬ

ϭρϬ

ϮϬϬ

ϮρϬ

ϯϬϬ

ϯρϬ

ϭϬ

ϮϬ

ϯϬ

κϬ

ρϬ

ϬϭϮϯκρ

DĞĂŶƌĂŝŶĨĂůů ;ŵŵͿ

^ĞĂƐŽŶ
ƌĚ ŬĐ ƌĨ

ρϬ

ϭϬϬ

ϭρϬ

ϮϬϬ

ϮρϬ

ϯϬϬ

ϯρϬ

ϭϬ

ϮϬ

ϯϬ

κϬ

ρϬ

ϬϭϮϯκρ

DĞĂŶŶƵŵďĞƌŽĨ/ŶƐĞĐƚƐ

DĞĂŶƌĂŝŶĨĂůů ;ŵŵͿ

^ĞĂƐŽŶ
Ɖŵ ƉƐ ƌĨ

Fig. 4 Relationship insect vectors with rainfall pattern according to the season (within 2 years); season 1 December–
February, 2 March–May, 3 June–August, 4 September–November. Rf Mean rainfall pattern, pm P. moesta, ps Proutista
sp., cx cixiid sp., st S. typica, rd R. dorsalis, kc K. ceylonica, nn N. nervosa, ic I. clypialis, gp G. punctifer

Free download pdf