Harmonisation of Regulatory Oversight in Biotechnology Safety Assessment of Transgenic Organisms in the Environment, Volume 5..

II.3. BRASSICA CROPS (

BRASSICA

SPP.) –

221

SAFETY ASSESSMENT OF TRANSGENIC ORGANISMS: OECD CONSENSUS DOCUMENTS, VOLUME 5 © OECD 2016

Table 3.13.

Interspecific and intergeneric sexual crossing attempts, degree of su

ccess and potential for gene introgression

1 (

cont.

)

Interspecific cross

Sexual cross

Field cross

Seeds/ cross

BC

♂

BC

♀^

Potential

References

Natural cross Introgression

B. napus × R. raphanistrum R. raphanistrum × B. napus

Y Y

Y F

Y

10

−4,

−^8

Y Y

Y Y

H VL

L VL

Baranger et al. (1995); Chadoeuf, Darmency and Maillet (1998); Darmency, Lefol and Fleury (1998); Eber et al. (1994); Lefol, Seguin-Swartz and Downey (1997); Rieger et al. (1999); Chèvre et al. (1998, 1997a); Wei and Darmency (2008)

B. napus × R. sativus R. sativus × B. napus

Y NR

NR F

0.6^0

NR NR

NR NR

VL VL

EL EL

Gupta (1997); Ammitzbøll and Jørgensen (2006)

B. napus × S. alba S. alba × B. napus

Y F

NR NR

Y

VL EL

EL EL

Bijral, Sharma and Kanwal (1993); Ripley and Arnison (1990); Mathias (1991); Lelivelt et al. (1993); Chèvre et al. (1994); Brown et al. (1997); Sridevi and Saria (1996)

B. napus × S. arvensis S. arvensis × B. napus

Y Y

F F

0.18 F

(^) F
L
EL
VL EL
Bing, Downey and Rakow (1991);Moyes et al. (2002); Inomata (1988); Brown et al. (1996); Sweet et al. (1997); Eastham and Sweet (2002); Daniels et al.
(2005); Lefol,
Danielou and Darmency (1996)
B. napus × D. erucoides D. erucoides × B. napus
NR Y
NR NR
Y
VL
VL
Ringdahl, McVetty and Sernyk. (1987)
Notes:
Y = successful cross by hand pollination or in the field; F = cross attempted but failed; NR= not reported. Probability of cro
ssing in nature and/or gene introgression
H = high, L = low, VL = very low, EL = extremely low.