The Structure of Evolutionary Theory

(Michael S) #1

476 THE STRUCTURE OF EVOLUTIONARY THEORY


claim now strongly compromised by accumulating data on mass extinction— see
Chapter 12): "The forms which are beaten and which yield their places to the new
and victorious forms, will generally be allied in groups, from inheriting some
inferiority in common; and therefore as new and improved groups spread
throughout the world, old groups will disappear from the world; and the succession
of forms in both ways will everywhere tend to correspond" (p. 327). Moreover,
note Darwin's continual emphasis on advantage and competition in crowded
ecosystems: "As natural selection acts solely by the preservation of profitable
modifications, each new form will tend in a fully-stocked country to take the place
of, and finally to exterminate, its own less improved parent or other less-favored
forms with which it comes into competition" (p. 172).
The link of progress to biotic competition in a crowded world had permeated
Darwin's thought from his first formulation of natural selection, as this passage
from the E Notebook (January 18, 1839) indicates: "The enormous number of
animals in the world depends on their varied structure and complexity. —Hence as
the forms became complicated, they opened fresh means of adding to their
complexity. —But yet there is no necessary tendency in the simple animals to
become complicated although all perhaps will have done so from the new relations
caused by the advancing complexity of others."
In the Origin of Species, all explicit statements about progress invoke a
rationale of biotic competition, and employ a metaphor of battle. I find Darwin's
conviction especially revealing in the light of his frank admission that he can
neither formulate a way to test his proposal, nor specify a criterion by which
progress might be measured:


But in one particular sense the more recent forms must, on my theory, be
higher than the more ancient; for each new species is formed by having had
some advantage in the struggle for life over other and preceding forms. If
under a nearly similar climate, the eocene inhabitants of one quarter of the
world were put into competition with the existing inhabitants of the same or
some other quarter, the eocene fauna or flora would certainly be beaten and
exterminated; as would a secondary fauna by an eocene, and a paleozoic
fauna by a secondary fauna. I do not doubt that this process of improvement
has affected in a marked and sensible manner the organization of the more
recent and victorious forms of life, in comparison with the ancient and
beaten forms; but I can see no way of testing this sort of progress (pp. 336-
337).

Darwin's most widely quoted statement about progress appears in the
summary to his two geological chapters. This famous passage also includes an odd
mixture of firm conviction based on metaphors of competition ("the race for life"
in this case), combined with some discomfort about the absence of a crisp
definition: "The inhabitants of each successive period in the world's history have
beaten their predecessors in the race for life, and are, in so far, higher in the scale
of nature; and this may account for that vague yet ill-defined

Free download pdf